Al Islam Productions

Target reached. No more required. May Allah accept all donations.

https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/alislam-productions-1?utm_term=4AA4JxMgY

Barelwis: The Prophet’s ﷺ Existence is Assumed, Imagined, Metaphorical!

https://barelwism.wordpress.com/2024/11/16/barelwis-the-prophets-%ef%b7%ba-existence-is-assumed-imagined-metaphorical/

Beware the Muftī Mājin (Corrupt Muftī)!

By Mufti Zameelur Rahman

Read Here: https://ahlussunnah.boards.net/thread/1101/beware-muft-jin-corrupt

__
Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum Telegram Channel: https://t.me/AhlusSunnahForum

A Note on Ḍarūrah vs Purposefulness

By Mufti Zameelur Rahman

Read Here: https://ahlussunnah.boards.net/post/2279/thread

__
Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum Telegram Channel: https://t.me/AhlusSunnahForum

https://youtu.be/utbv-9yRoM4?si=5IVGNdw0TXfayPzK

The Fatwā ruling today *(Note: author passed away 951 Hijrī which is 495 years ago)* is that it is disliked for Women to attend any prayers due to the rampant spread of corruption. If it is disliked for them to attend the masjid for prayer, it is even more appropriate for it to be disliked for them to attend sermons or bayaan gatherings, especially among the gatherings of those ignorant individuals who have adorned themselves with the appearance of the ‘Ulamā’.

Sharḥ Mullā Miskīn (Ma‘īn al-Dīn al-Harawī) ‘ala Kanz al-Daqā’iq fī Furū‘ al-Ḥanafiyya, 1/34, ed. al-Maṭba‘a al-Ḥusaynīyya al-Miṣrīyya.

The 2 authors of the initial pro freemixing paper and the ones who endorsed it were better off not attempting to write in the first place. They've really put the world of academic scholarship into disrepute.

They still have time to become real scholars by joining the concensus of the ummah on the topic and retracting from their miserably failed attempt in furthering Satan's cause.

Inflating Shubuhāt: Response to 'Reflections' on the Above Rebuttal

By Mufti Zameelur Rahman

Read Here: https://ahlussunnah.boards.net/post/2278/thread

__
Join the Ahlus Sunnah Forum Telegram Channel: https://t.me/AhlusSunnahForum

I've finished reading it ما شاء الله. Very good. Mufti Zameel Sb did an excellent job exposing that terrible work. The arguments of these people have been dismantled very thoroughly and convincingly. He has exposed the weakness and flaws of their arguments very well. Mufti Zameel Sb has shown the truth is they only wanted to defend the Fasiqs who enjoy sitting with women and looking at women. It's not guidelines on gender interaction. This is deception and fraud from them even in the title of their work! Their document's title should be supporting Ikhtilat. Mufti Zameel Sb is very ilmi and academic so he has been a bit soft on these people and just focused on the main points and academically refuted them. There are other problems in their article. I'll write some down here so you can see. I'll start with the blunders of Zeeshan and Muntasir first إن شاء الله.

1. On page 2 they reference الهداية and they mention the exception in the Hanafi Mazhab of touching an elderly woman's hand. They described her as 'an undesirous elderly woman (العجوز التي لا تَشتَهِي)'. But, الهداية mentions 'an UNDESIRABLE elderly woman' not 'UNDESIROUS'. Its لا تُشتَهَى not لا تَشتَهِي like they wrote wrongly.

2. On page 5 they reference Mufti Taqi Sb's work as فتح الملهم but Mufti Taqi Sb's work's title is تكملة فتح الملهم and فتح الملهم is the name of the book he was completing. This is obvious from the book's title page.

3. On page 39 they write 'See al-Haytamī, ʿArāʾis al-ghurar wa-gharāʾis al-fikar' but this book is not by الهيتمي. It's by الهيتي.

This next one is from Yasir's endorsement.

4. On page 51 Yasir translates Quran 33:53 as 'And when you ask his (Prophet ﷺ) wives for something, ask them from behind a barrier.' But the verse doesn't say 'when you ask his wives'. It says 'when you ask them' and 'them' refers to the Mubarak wives of Nabi صلى الله عليه وسلم. It's وَإِذَا سَأَلْتُمُوهُنَّ مَتَاعًا فَاسْأَلُوهُنَّ مِنْ وَرَاءِ حِجَابٍ. It's not وإذا سألتم أزواجه متاعا.

And this one is from Afnan's endorsement.

5. On page 43 Zeeshan and Muntasir quote الجصاص as saying that a person who believes deliberately omitting تسمية when slaughtering an animal renders it Haram (for example the Hanafiyya) and if they eat such meat they are guilty of فسق but those who don't believe it renders it Haram (for example the Shafiiyya) would not be guilty of فسق if they ate it. But on page 47 Affan writes 'One cannot declare a person ‘fāsiq’ if he commits an act which is sinful according to some scholars of fiqh and not a sin according to others … For example, consuming crab is not allowed according to Ḥanafis, while it is perfectly ḥalāl according to the majority of other fuqahāʾ. But a Ḥanafi eating a crab would not be considered a ‘fāsiq’, even though the Ḥanafi argument requires it to be so.' This endorser Affan is blatantly contradicting the authors of the article here!!! I wonder did Zeeshan and Muntasir even read this endorsement before including it? Of course الجصاص is right and Affan is wrong. But if it's a minor sin it will be فسق with persistence and with major sin it will be فسق by just once.

There's probably many more blunders but after reading Mufti Zameel Sb's solid dismantling of the article we are forced to question the motives of the authors and the competence of every single one of the endorsers. I already knew the endorsers were all problematic in some way or other. Some of them are complete Jahil in Fiqh like Haddad. No serious Alim would add his name on anything. It is a disgrace. And obviously none of them are competent in Fiqh or they wouldn't endorse it. They must be questioned why they endorse weak and flawed research like this justifying Ikhtilat. I know the document was taught in Whitethread Institute where Zeeshan teaches. They should be questioned as well why they allow weak and flawed research like this to be taught there.

یہ ان لوگوں کی اچھی مثال ہے جو نااہلی کے باوجود اپنے آپ کو بہت اہل سمجھتے ہیں

Review:

Ml Yasir U-Turn Pro-Freemixing Khan!
Is this post regarding your Peer Asrar Rashid? We understand it may have been a difficult choice between Peer Sahib and the anti-Sectarian chap from Luton but we must still say man up and be clear. Either say his name, or even 'Barelwi-Madkhalite' at least, just as you've been posting this rubbish sectarian name-calling regarding Deobandis in the past. Or is it that your bravery only comes out against your own madrasa and teachers and colleagues, and you become a mouse in front of Asrar The-Runner Rashid?

May Allah reward the author, Mufti Zameelur Rahman, for defending Islam with his pen. May this work be very weighty in his scale of good deeds.

Can the free mixing crew please read this with Allah and His Messenger sallallahu alaihi wa sallam in mind, not the 'hijabis' who they're used to seeing in the first row of the auditoriums, IN-SHA-ALLAH the haqq will enter their hearts.

New Release: Guidelines for Gender Interaction in Islam: A Rebuttal by Mufti Zameelur Rahman

Daniel making excuses for Twelvers saying "the 12ers are explicit that the 12 Imams are not Prophets."

Daniel should know that they are also explicit in saying their 12 are GREATER than prophets and also in saying that the only thing stopping them from calling the 12 Imams Prophets is consideration of the respect of the Final Prophet, Muhammad sallallahu alaihi wassallam!

So IF (hypothetically) a Madkhali says 'MBS is not a Prophet but he's greater than Prophets and that the only thing stopping him from calling MBS a Prophet is respect for Rasoolullah sallallahu alaihi wasallam', would Daniel not see that as clear kufr??

17 major Ulema councils backed a statement (September 2024) by Muslim Scholars Association against the Iranian regime for using the Palestinian cause for their own benefit, exposing their true intent and not to forget their crimes in Syria, Iraq and elsewhere.

Amongst the signatories include Sheikh Muhammad Hassan al-Dedew.

Ulema Councils who backed the statement:

* Association of Muslim Scholars
* Association of Syrian Scholars
* Association of Eritrean Scholars
* Yemen Scholars Council
* Organisation of Muslim Scholars in Iraq
* World Association of Fuqaha
* Sudanese Union of Imams and Preachers
* Association of Moroccan Scholars.
* The Association of the Sunnis in Iraq
* Association of Southeast Asian Scholars
* Libyan Scholars Council
* The World Organisation for the Advocacy of Palestine.
* Syrian Islamic Council

https://x.com/ZahidDOAM/status/1844679327515861419

*A PROOF FOR TAFWĪḌ FROM THE ṢAḤĀBĪ: UBAYY IBN KA'B (RĀ)*

Shaykh Nidāl Ālih Rashshī mentioned the following as a proof for making Tafwīḍ of the ambiguous verses of the Qur'an that includes the Ṣifāt (attributes) of Allah in his Al-Badr al-Anwar Sharḥ al-Fiqh al-Akbar Lil-Imām al-A'ẓam Abī Ḥanīfah an-Nu'mān (p. 196):

وقول أبي بن كعب رضي الله عنه: (كتاب الله ما استبان منه فاعمل به، وما اشتبه عليك فآمن به وكله إلى عالمه)، رواه ابن أبي شيبة (1)، وهو يبطل قول أهل البدعة في إنكار تفويض المتشابه إلى الله عز وجل وجعله من شر الاقوال .
______
(1) (مصنف ابن أبي شيبة) (30032).
Meaning:

And the saying of Ubayy ibn Ka'b (may Allah be pleased with him): "The Book of Allah: what is clear from it, act upon it; *and what is ambiguous to you, believe in it and entrust it to the One who knows it."* This was narrated by Ibn Abi Shaybah (1). This invalidates the statement of the people of innovation who deny delegating [tafwīd] the ambiguous verses [mutashābih] to Allah, the Mighty and Majestic, and consider it one of the worst statements.
________
(1) (Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah) (30032).


www.darultahqiq.com

The same nation that has butchered the most Muslims throughout history and recently in Shaam.....

Is Twelver Shiaim a part of Islam according to Ml Yasir?

The Ml Yasir U-Turn Khan after the U-Turn:

Old Ml Yasir U-Turn Khan before the U-Turn: