Channel link:
https://t.me/abdulhamid12
Original Fatwa:
https://t.me/A_lzoukory/74817
PDF:
https://t.me/abdulhamid12/1331
Welcome to the official English channel of Sheikh 'Abdulhamīd ibn Yahyā al-Zoukorī, also known as @abdulhamid12 on Telegram. This channel is dedicated to providing followers with a wealth of content related to the Sheikh. From fatwas to articles, lectures, speeches, advice, lessons, and books, subscribers can find a wide range of valuable information here. Sheikh 'Abdulhamīd is a respected figure in the Islamic community, and his teachings and insights on various topics are highly regarded. To learn more about the Sheikh and his work, be sure to visit his website at www.alzoukory.com. Stay connected with the official English channel to stay updated on the latest content and teachings from Sheikh 'Abdulhamīd ibn Yahyā al-Zoukorī.
27 Oct, 17:15
27 Oct, 17:15
(a sin)
and I did not discuss it with him, thinking that he would distinguish between innovation and sin, as is the case with those who begin seeking knowledge, let alone those who lead the daʿwah. If it were the case that it was differentiated, then the sin and opposition are condemned, and the one who does it is not declared an innovator, because declaring someone an innovator due to sin is the way of the people of misguidance. (Your book is good and its arrangement is good, but if the result is that Abū Ḥāzim is an innovator, then revise the book)
. Meaning: that the result is wrong, so it was necessary for him to take the advice and publish the book as advice on the issue of Tarbiyah an-Nisāʾ without exceeding limits in the rulings, but when will they understand those who do not want to understand? Then its meaning is that it is not about accepting the guidance when sending it, but rather he wanted to increase the number of those who agree. (As for the ruling)
meaning on Abū Ḥāzim of innovation (then wait for Shaykh Yaḥyā)
. So there is nothing wrong with his statement as he referred it to the ‘wealthy’ one[1] and warned him against rushing to a judgement that might lead to him being wronged. That is because Abū Fayrūz’s ruling was excessive in our view. As for our virtuous Shaykh Yaḥyā al-Ḥajūrī -may Allāh preserve him-, he said (Abū Fayrūz wanted to denounce evil, so he changed it in the harshest manner)
. 19 Oct, 21:53
19 Oct, 21:37
19 Oct, 21:14
19 Oct, 21:02
19 Oct, 19:18
19 Oct, 19:06
19 Oct, 18:48
19 Oct, 18:41
19 Oct, 18:21
19 Oct, 18:10
19 Oct, 18:10
13 Oct, 06:28
06 Oct, 06:43