Alek Yerbury

I openly ask anyone who agrees with the work that I am doing, wants to support the actions that I am taking, and has the ability to, to donate even a small or trivial amount of money, but the caveat is that they should NOT donate money to me personally. Instead, they should donate it to the National Rebirth Party:

https://nationalrebirthparty.org.uk/Donate/

Investing in organisations and causes is infinitely more effective than investing in individual people. Causes do greater good, for a greater number of people, and most importantly they do not rest their entire success or failure on ONE single person, and so they are much harder to destroy or to fail. Our sphere of politics is NOT short of money. Over the years, tens of millions of pounds have been invested in particular individuals, and those tens of millions of pounds have been wasted precisely because they haven’t been invested correctly. Those individuals either give up, or take the money and run, or simply die, and all the investment is lost.

When you invest in causes, you do not face this problem.

If we want success that is greater than just ONE single person, then we have to start investing in our people as a WHOLE.

Many people make the grooming gang atrocities more complicated than they need to be. The solution to it from a legal perspective is very simple, and in line with Demand #8 of the National Agenda of the National Rebirth Party:

"We demand a justice system with the end goal of removing the most dangerous offenders from society. The most serious crimes, including crimes against the nation and its people, must carry the death penalty."

Thus,

1) Anyone who carries/carried out OR wilfully facilitates/facilitated organised rape and sexual abuse must be put to death.

2) Any person OR group of people who are creating an environment that is likely to lead to such crimes, must either stop creating that environment OR face whatever restrictions are necessary to put upon them, to make that environment disappear.

And to note, these consequences would apply to any person of any religion or race.

Such crimes would be made to stop, because anyone orchestrating them would be obliterated from the Earth.

If you see this gofundme campaign do not donate to it or endorse it it.
https://www.gofundme.com/f/release-the-transcripts just repost this in response:

This is an absolute con of another vile grifter seeking to profit from the suffering of victims.

Firstly, transcripts do not cost that much. I know because I have gone about obtaining them before, mostly for appeals. It costs nowhere near 28k. Or £4 per page, they cost on average 74p- £2 per folio. There are also the costs of the application to the court and the transcriber fees but they would not amount to anywhere near 28k. He is having your eyes out and scamming you.

Secondly he is lying saying the victims can not obtain transcripts. Victims of rape, serious assaults and family of homicide victims always get permission from the court to obtain the transcripts often they are free of charge to those victims.

Thirdly, in cases involving children, the court will usually not grant permission to release the transcripts to a member of the public, especially if the victim or their family do not wish for the transcripts to be made public. They may not want every detail of the traumatic experiences they endured in the public domain. It is also to protect the anonymity of the victim.

Fourthly he has not even stated what transcripts of the proceedings he is seeking to obtain. There are different transcripts for different parts of the proceedings.

Finally what he intends to do is to publish the details of what was done to a victim. Nothing more. He's not obtaining them for the victims' benefit.

He wishes to obtain those transcripts so he can write articles about what the victim endured which benefits only himself through social media traction, personal profile boosting and monetary gain.

We are all very aware of what these gangs of foreign men are doing to white kids. The only people's who would want to read the graphic details of the rape of these child victims are nonces. Nobody else is going to gain anything from reading the fine details of what the victim endured.

This is nothing more than a sickening personal grift by somebody who wants to boost their personal profile as another useless "citizen journalist" and make money from exploiting the suffering of the victims of that case.

It is utterly disgusting and people donating to this idiot are either semi retarded morons who are easily scammed or nonces hoping they will get some vile graphic content about child rape to entertain themselves with.

The National Rebirth Party needs YOUR help to succeed in implementing our NATIONAL AGENDA. Victory is a collective effort.

JOIN the Party as an OFFICIAL MEMBER and get active with your nearest branch:

https://nationalrebirthparty.org.uk/JOIN-as-a-Member/

SUPPORT the Party in its day-to-day running, expansion, and future election campaigns by DONATING:

https://nationalrebirthparty.org.uk/Donate/

Visit our website

http://nationalrebirthparty.org.uk

to JOIN, DONATE or CONTACT US today

Let the chains of Albion, SHATTER

Watching this endless messiah musical chairs between Farage, Robinson, Musk, Lowe...

It's like politics with ADHD

And they still aren't getting it, that the reason why they can't obtain any political power is because the people they keep lionising as messiahs, are utterly horrendous people as far as the other 99% of the population is concerned.

There are things to be written on the 'Bandwagon' faction of politics and how to deal with it. Defining characteristic is creating messiahs, then crucifying their messiahs the second they say ONE thing the faction doesn't like, then rinsing and repeating endlessly.

First Tice was the messiah
Then Ben Habib was the messiah
Then Farage was the messiah
Then Tommy Robinson was the messiah
Now Elon Musk is the messiah

It's completely dysfunctional.

I don't have any time for this idea that British people inherently behave a certain way based on wealth or class, or that people should behave in a certain way because they are 'working-class', 'poor', or 'uneducated'.

I think the quote from Sharpe's Rifles said it best:

'There's no sin in being born in the dirt, boys, but it's a terrible sin to want to stay there.'

Truthfully, the Conservative movement as a whole, which includes Reform, is worse than Labour.

The reason that the traditional 'right' is worse is because although they bring about the same outcomes, the 'right' tends to criticise all of those outcomes whilst denying that its own cherished principles of liberalism, individualism and capitalism are responsible.

If you have two forces, both bringing about the same destructive outcome, but one is doing it in the demented belief that it is good, whereas the other is still doing it but refuses to even acknowledge they are doing it, the second one is worse.

You can order copies of our monthly Party magazine, Rise Britannia, from our website, for the cost of £2 plus postage.

https://nationalrebirthparty.org.uk/Rise-Britannia/

READ about what our branches have been doing, letters, articles, poetry and submissions from our supporters, members and friends.

Having a printed magazine gives you something to show to friends, family and colleagues, and get them interested in the Party and our National Agenda

Get involved with the National Rebirth Party today

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate | Join

The reason why 'Tommy Robinson' and his 'team' get persistently ignored by serious politicians, is because the way they conduct themselves is not respectable. Getting people to 'like' you is easy. Getting people to respect you enough to actually entrust you with political authority is hard.

Ways they conduct themselves such as: widely known issues with cocaine use and alcohol use, football hooliganism, issues with sexual predation on grooming gang victims, constantly claiming to be short of money whilst living in 5 star luxury in Tenerife...

These kinds of issues make 95% of the population lose respect for the person, even if they say all the 'right' things.

Unfortunately, the collective attitude (and I'm not blaming any individuals for this as it's a collective problem) within the 'TR movement' has been to shrug off these things as though they either don't exist or just don't matter, because the 'right' things are being said. That then tarnishes the entire group, because the view of the other 95% of society is that the entire group thinks those things are 'okay'.

It's similar to how if it was found out that your local MP was a sex offender, that person would likely never be elected again, even if people agreed with what they said, because they couldn't turn a blind eye to such atrocious conduct. If their party told you that it didn't matter they were a sex offender, 95% of people would lose respect for the entire party.

If the 'TR' crowd actually want to be listened to and represented, ultimately they have to be prepared to change themselves as well, and start imposing standards within their own circles even if it means getting rid of their old messiahs and getting new, more respectable ones.

Would appreciate if anyone on here could assist with this survey. It is being conducted on behalf of a charitable food provider, who is doing market surveys with a view to providing food parcels as 'meals' to people in need.

Very simple survey, please answer in a comment (names not necessary):

1. Male/Female
2. Age
3. Town/city of residence
4. What 'flavour' do you like the most out of STRAWBERRY, VANILLA or CHOCOLATE?

Alek Yerbury pinned «The National Rebirth Party has an exciting schedule so far in 2025, with our established Branches becoming more active in campaigning, community projects and electoral campaigning. We also have new Branches that are opening up, and are getting teams established…»

The National Rebirth Party has an exciting schedule so far in 2025, with our established Branches becoming more active in campaigning, community projects and electoral campaigning. We also have new Branches that are opening up, and are getting teams established in those areas for regular activity going forward. Read about our BRANCHES in detail here:

https://nationalrebirthparty.org.uk/Party-Branches/

All branches regularly hold Meetings and activities such as stalls, canvassing and outreach that YOU can get involved in. Coming to our Branch Meetings are a good way to be introduced to the rest of the Branch. We also have chat groups that supporters and members can join. To get involved, contact:

Birmingham
[email protected]

Hull
[email protected]

Leeds
[email protected]

London
[email protected]

Manchester
[email protected]

Nottingham/Leicester
[email protected]

Bournemouth
[email protected]

East Anglia
Use [email protected]

Do YOU want to set up a Branch in YOUR area? Then contact the Party and put yourself forward as a Leader and work with the Party to get one established:

https://nationalrebirthparty.org.uk/JOIN-as-a-Leader-or-Candidate/

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate

The idea of 'deporting' or 'remigrating' people who orchestrate mass rape is insane to me.

The penalty should be death for crimes such as that. Deporting people for it is a joke.

The standout difference between the National Rebirth Party and all the rest, is that while others will say, 'Give us time, funding, membership and votes and we will help you,' we instead say, 'Give us time, funding, membership and votes, and we can give you a way to help yourselves.'

The British people are the architects of their own fate.

Victory is built upon sacrifices. There is no way of cheating it.

My advice to people throughout 2025 is to accept that if you want to make the world as you want it to be, then you must prepare yourself to make sacrifices to get there. If anyone wants to raise issues of censorship, doxxing, being 'fired', losing friends, they can. But this is all I will say to them:

Victory is built upon sacrifices. You can't have one without the other. Take it or leave it.

The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, is the ultimate example of a person who is effectively immune from even legitimate criticism simply because nobody else offers any alternative.

There hasn't been anyone else putting themselves in the running for the position, who has offered anything different at all, OR who has demonstrated any kind of competence that is greater than his. 99% of criticism of Khan, especially on social media, is criticising him for something he is doing, whilst offering no other proposed course of action.

Khan wins by default at this point, by being the only person actually trying.

The lesson for those opposed to him (which is most people in London, even most Asians), is to come up with a comprehensive alternative themselves BEFORE they pile on the criticism.

Onwards to 2025

Rise Britannia Edition #04, December 2024, has now gone to print and is available to order on our website

READ letters from Party officials, articles, letters to the editor, opinion pieces, and reports from our Branches on their activities and projects that YOU can get involved in.

Collect your copy in person at Branch meetings and events, or order online HERE

Retail price £2 plus postage when ordered online. Order more than 10 copies for free postage.

If you would like to become an authorised re-seller of Rise Britannia, and would like to purchase 50 or more copies at discount for resale, then contact the editor at:

[email protected]

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate

On an X space a few weeks ago, I was having a discussion with Pete North, a reasonably well-known commentator on the right, and I brought up the issue whereby the 'right', by and large, is content with collectivising on the internet, and rarely makes an effort to actually try and collectivise in real life. On the other hand, the 'left', does comparatively little on the internet and regularly collectivises in the physical world. Mr North largely disagreed with me about the need for real-world collective activity, on the basis that the internet was just as good.

Pictured above, are the inevitable consequences of that line of thinking.

The London Branch of the National Rebirth Party held a day of action in Bexleyheath, which was very busy despite the weather. An afternoon manning a stall in the central precinct was followed by a Branch social nearby in the evening. There is huge demand in London for a genuine alternative to the old parties of the system, and multiple people that our branch members spoke to said the same thing. One person explained that they had voted for Reform UK, but regretted it due to a feeling that it had just turned out to be more of the same.

Get involved with our London Branch today by contacting the Branch directly on:

[email protected]

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate | Join

By the time of the next General Election, the 'Right' (I don't count the National Rebirth Party as part of this, because it exists in a genuine third position) will look like this:

The Conservatives will still be chugging along. The parties of the 'alt-right' (Reform, UKIP, Homeland etc.), will have manifestos which, as a whole, will be so similar to each other that the voter base they cater for (ethnocentric conservatives) will effortlessly bounce between each one depending on who happened to say the last thing that they liked. Thus the voter base they cater for will be so unpredictable that nobody can accurately plan anything they are doing.

It will create a state of equilibrium in which none of those parties can fully overcome any of the others, but also can't be defeated themselves, creating a permanent fragmentation.

The only way out of that fragmentation at that point, will be for the parties involved to totally rebrand themselves into something radically different (NOT just in immigration policy) from ALL the others, BUT the first Party to do that takes in inevitable short-term hit as it loses a good chunk of its present support base. Thus creating a toxic paradox whereby in order to move forward in the long-term, they have to move backwards in the short-term.

Now all of this can be avoided, by being RADICALLY different NOW rather than a few years down the line, but, again, that still means being prepared to make short-term sacrifices, which most aren't prepared to make.

The London Branch of the National Rebirth Party was out yesterday for an afternoon stall (I'm sure pictures and a post about it will follow shortly on the Party channels), and it really highlights, again, this major cultural problem within the sphere of 'nationalism':

Places that are actually living with the issues that 'nationalists' claim to be trying to solve, are avoided like the plague by the overwhelming majority of 'nationalist' parties. Even when those parties organise at a county or regional level, the entire regions efforts tend to avoid major population centres, particularly anywhere that isn't 'white' enough. And this is more boggling when you consider that many parties in the 'nationalist' umbrella are effectively single-issue parties that only have coherent and detailed policies on the sole topic of immigration.

So I fundamentally ask the question to those people: What is the point of being a single-issue party on immigration/demographics, if you aren't going to actually campaign in the places where people are living with this problem and want it resolved?

The reason for this cultural behaviour (and I'm not blaming any individual for it, it is a collective fault that has grown over the last 20 years) is a combination of cowardice and ignorance.

There genuinely are many, many people within this segment of politics, who look down on the working masses as 'peasants'. It comes across in the seemingly trivial things that people say and do over a long period of time, the way they talk to people and about people, the propagation of easy answers to difficult problems and then treating people like idiots for identifying obvious flaws, the racialised NIMBY/Tory attitude that I've talked about at length before, the attitude of 'collectivism but only when it suits me.'

It boils down to an interpretation of nationalism that is less National Community and more of an, 'I'm All Right, Jack', than anything else.

It isn't everyone, but it genuinely does seem to be the dominant collective attitude within nationalism, at the moment, and it's the reason for the continual lack of success. I imagine it will be down to the National Rebirth Party, and a small number of others, to actually carry the torch in changing this.

Over the last week, our Leeds Branch has been canvassing around the Beeston and Holbeck area of South Leeds constituency, asking people their attitudes towards society's major issues, and sharing our own. We presented over 70 people with the following statements, asking them whether they agreed or disagreed:

1. The economy is purposefully run in such a way to keep all the wealth in the hands of a few people.

2. The government should be actively protecting British industries and businesses, even if it means getting rid of the free market.

3. I don’t mind paying higher taxes to improve public services like the NHS, as long as they provide GOOD service and are value for money.

4. The main reason the NHS is constantly short on funds and staff is because those at higher levels don’t manage it properly and waste resources.

5. Immigration tends to make problems (like housing, poor public services, crime, tensions in the community) WORSE rather than better.

6. The foreign policies of the British government and the way they have impacted places like the Middle East are part of the reason why those people have to leave their home countries.

7. The British government should prioritise those who are already living here over anyone else.

The results we obtained showed that people overwhelmingly 'agreed' with ALL of them, on a scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The results will be published in full in December's Edition of Rise Britannia. This is in an area with high levels of immigration, high levels of political apathy, and what you would call typical 'disenfranchised Labour voters'.

This ultimately proves what we have often said: that in these areas, the demand for a genuine alternative is highest, but the millions of people there aren't being offered one by any of the so-called 'alternative' parties, who take one look at a census and fear to tread there.

If you live in West Yorkshire, get involved today by contacting [email protected]

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate | Join

The Old Men of the System have been saying this since the 1970s.

'Vote for X and we will end immigration'

And they proceed to make it worse.

Anyone promising to just 'end immigration' in a vacuum without presenting any kind of adjustment to any other aspect of society, the economy or the political system, is playing the voter for an idiot.

At the moment, everyone who works for the National Rebirth Party is a volunteer. All of our funds get used on administrative costs, setting up branches with equipment and printed material, set up costs for our branch projects, and building a fund for use in future election campaigns.

If everyone who expressed support for the Party gave us only £5, we would raise a phenomenal amount of money to use towards our growth.

https://nationalrebirthparty.org.uk/Donate/

If you are prepared to donate £5, why not spend the same amount buying a printed copy of our Manifesto, which you can share with others?

https://nationalrebirthparty.org.uk/Agenda/

If you are prepared to donate £36, why not become an OFFICIAL MEMBER of the Party?

https://nationalrebirthparty.org.uk/JOIN-as-a-Member/

The success of the National Agenda, is a collective effort.

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate | Join

One of the best qualities that people can have in the political struggle, is the mental fortitude to write off failed work, and start again.

We are not 'continuing on' the nationalist movement, we are recreating it. There is nothing left to salvage or reconstitute any more, and those fixated on trying only end up with inferior versions of their previous endeavours.

It is a hard thing, for people who have spent years or decades invested in a certain idea or method, to just trash it all and start again. But they have to ask themselves, what is more important:

Yesterday, or tomorrow?

You can order copies of our monthly Party magazine, Rise Britannia, from our website, for the cost of £2 plus postage.

https://nationalrebirthparty.org.uk/Rise-Britannia/

READ about what our branches have been doing, letters, articles, poetry and submissions from our supporters, members and friends.

Having a printed magazine gives you something to show to friends, family and colleagues, and get them interested in the Party and our National Agenda

Get involved with the National Rebirth Party today

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate | Join

In Summary:

The Twenty Demands of the National Agenda:

1. We demand that only people of British heritage or lineage shall be inherently entitled by birth to be British
citizens.

2. We demand that foreigners whose presence is harmful to the interests of the National Community be
expelled, without exception, from Great Britain. Those who enter without permission shall be expelled
by default and prohibited from ever returning.

3. We demand that only British citizens be permitted to vote or hold public office at any level.

4. We demand that no foreign treaty, alliance, war or undertaking be entered into or continued unless it
serves the interests of the National Community. This includes the distribution of British money to foreign
nations.

5. We demand that all citizens have equal rights, and equal duties to society. Those who refuse to carry out
their duties will be stripped of their rights.

6. We demand that every British citizen has a duty to be productive, to the best of their ability. All honest
work is honourable, and work is a duty.

7. We demand that all British men must perform some kind of military service for a period of at least 18
months, to the best of their ability.

8. We demand a justice system with the end goal of removing the most dangerous offenders from society.
The most serious crimes, including crimes against the nation and its people, must carry the death penalty.

9. We demand the creation of a new British Law System whereby the first principle of the system is
accessibility.

10. We demand freedom of religion for all British people, so long as the religion does not threaten or harm
the interests of the National Community. Any religion which does this shall be prohibited.

11. We demand the continuation of state-funded education. We further demand that the state should establish
and finance a series of schools of excellence, which will provide scholarship education of the highest
possible quality, free of charge, with admittance purely on the basis of academic merit.

12. We demand that British citizens shall continue to have access to a state-funded National Health Service,
and the state should routinely promote and fund programmes which encourage a physically and mentally
healthy lifestyle. Foreigners or visitors will be required to pay for the use of public health services.

13. We demand that the re-zoning of green land for other uses must only occur by absolute national necessity.
Policies to protect the environment must be realistic and achievable and not based on impossible goals.

14. We demand that productive private enterprise be bolstered as a cornerstone of British society. Businesses
should be encouraged to form co-operatives and collaborate where possible for mutual benefit. The state
must support businesses which work towards national economic goals.

15. We demand that all trade unions be amalgamated, and the national government assume the duty of the
protection of the worker.

16. We demand that all public utilities and transportation networks be placed into public ownership. The only
profits they will take will be those required for future investment.

17. We demand that the financial method of endlessly accumulating debt be ended, and that the two principal
objectives of fiscal policy be to 1) eliminate debt, and 2) prevent inflation.

18. We demand that tariffs be applied where necessary to protect and foster the development of British
enterprises. International capitalism, and its relentless destruction of British industries, must be ended.

19. We demand a welfare system that provides unemployed or destitute persons productive employment as
opposed to a dependency income. The welfare system must also include profit margin limitations on rents
and property prices.

20. We demand that the British state be controlled by a strong national government, with total authority,
whose legitimacy derives directly from the consent of the British citizenry by way of plebiscites and
referenda of public approval.

The singular reason that the demographic issue continues to get worse is because those who know it's an issue, are spending most of their time just telling each other it's an issue, or telling the public what they already know (that immigration is out of control), instead of actually doing anything constructive about it.

In the age of the internet, many people have genuinely convinced themselves that just telling people things is a form of 'action'. It isn't. And they spend all of their time doom-mongering and agitating themselves, instead of doing constructive work, leading by example, and pushing a genuine alternative agenda.

New Article on the Party Website:

Socialism or Sectarianism

"The native political sphere in Britain is at something of a crossroads...The ‘far-right’ position is one that, whilst ethnocentric, has its reasoning in capitalism, libertarianism, and Conservatism...The ‘socialist’ position is one that has its reasoning in collectivism, not just from a racial perspective, but also from an economic and governmental perspective."

By Alek Yerbury, Party Leader

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate

Janis Prauls writes about how joining the army transformed his life and made him a better person.

https://radicaldose.com/how-the-army-changed-my-life/

Radical Dose

Written by a Latvian; I agree with the sentiments expressed here with regard to military life and how it changes your thinking.

'But, doesn't backing Labour go against all of our principles as a party?'

'That's the genius: we have no principles to begin with'

One of the most frustrating things I observe within politics is the way that resources, especially money, get used in the sphere of 'nationalism' and 'the right'. Primarily in the sense that huge amounts of money get used in ways that benefit only a tiny number of people (or in some cases just ONE person), meanwhile there is almost a culture of resistance to investing money in collective enterprises that benefit HUGE numbers of people.

Perfect examples are the ways that people have given tens, even HUNDREDS of thousands of pounds to people who have gone to prison or had legal problems, even though all that money only benefits that ONE individual. But at the same time, if someone created a collective enterprise aimed at challenging the legal system, it would be like trying to get blood out of a stone. Another example is the way that nationalists will throw hundreds of thousands of pounds at projects to 'buy land', which only half a dozen people will actually use and benefit from, but at the same time trying to get them to invest in things like creating food banks, is (in most cases) like getting blood from a stone. Another example is the way that many will give seemingly endless amounts of money to online 'streamers', even though it benefits absolutely nobody but that singular individual, but give comparatively little to real world organisations.

It's an example of individualistic mentality within 'nationalism' at work. It's also why the 'left' are much more powerful, because they use their resources collectively rather than all for the benefit of a tiny number of people.

Amuses me that three times in the last 24 hours I've had people telling me that 'this' or 'that', 'looks bad' or 'sounds bad', and then I look at the social media commentary of the people saying that, and in all three cases it's diatribes of how women shouldn't be allowed to vote. This is the reason I rarely listen to criticism from anonymous people online.

Much is being said about the Irish elections, and why, despite immigration being such a major issue for so many people, anti-immigration parties have failed to get anywhere:

This is why:

Although immigration is a MAJOR issue for MOST of the population, people will not vote for a Party solely on the basis of immigration policy, because the average person recognises that immigration problems are a SYMPTOM of wider issues with the social, economic and political system.

They therefore will not vote for people who offer hard-line immigration stances, but otherwise offer no real changes to the underlying system that causes these problems.

The exact same voting behaviour (support and agreement but NOT votes) was replicated at the GE in the UK, and will be replicated for the nationalist parties in Britain.

This is the reason why the National Rebirth Party has a COMPREHENSIVE National Agenda which deals with the entire social, economic and political system.

The Twenty Highest and Twenty Lowest Turnouts at Constituency Elections in 2024

The pattern is so blindingly obvious it is beggars belief that, of all the forces currently active and putting themselves in the sphere of 'nationalism', the NRP and myself seem to be the only Party that actually recognises it.

The natural support base by sheer numbers for a genuine third option to the Marxism of the left and the capitalism of the right, is to be found in the working and middle class, deprived and ignored urban areas. For many of these people, immigration will be their single biggest concern. For others, it will be a concern but NOT their biggest concern. For some, it won't be a concern at all. Which further highlights the point that, again, is so blindingly obvious it is beggars belief how many 'leaders' can't see it: That you cannot win elections solely on the back of immigration policy.

Of the Twenty Demands of the National Agenda, only two of them deal with immigration, and that is all that is needed.

As was highlighted to me the other day by some of the Birmingham branch of the NRP, today is the 50th anniversary of the Birmingham Pub Bombings, carried out by the IRA on 21st November 1974, something that is often forgotten or ignored outside of Birmingham. There are still many people alive today who either remember the events or who knew the 21 people who died.

Everyone is talking about the problems facing farmers, and offering their support, but what is the solution?

How would the National Agenda of the National Rebirth Party remedy the farmers problems?

Demand #14 - That productive private enterprise be bolstered as a cornerstone of British society. Businesses should be encouraged to form co-operatives and collaborate where possible for mutual benefit. The state must support businesses which work towards national economic goals.

The farmers always struggled for political representation because 1) there are numerically not very many of them, 2) they tend to be cash poor which means options for fiscal influence are limited, and 3) most factions in the current system are actively out to destroy them. The sector as a whole is in the national interest, because the ability to be self-sufficient in food production, so far as possible, makes our people less vulnerable on the international stage, and it keeps money and goods in the country, which improves the general prosperity of the population. The state should be actively supporting the existence of farms, not necessarily through tax controls/relief, but through direct financial support to the industry itself, direct investment where certain food production is required or needs expansion, price controls where necessary, and the use of state organisational power to help administrate and co-ordinate the activities of the agricultural sector as a whole. Farmers are, ultimately, self-employed, so they have never been able to be ‘unionised’ in the way that other sectors have. With an element of central direction of the entire agricultural sector, the farmers as a collective would be able to be represented in a government ministry in the same way as we propose for the labour force as a whole (Demand #15 on labour and trade unions).

Demand #18 - That tariffs be applied where necessary to protect and foster the development of British enterprises. International capitalism, and its relentless destruction of British industries, must be ended.

Free-market capitalism is the single biggest detriment to British agriculture, as it forces the sector to compete with goods from overseas, including those provided at slave wages. The implementation of tariffs and import/export controls, eliminates this problem. If certain foodstuffs are being produced in Britain, they should not be able to be routinely undercut through imports. Although this, on its own, would lead to price increases for certain goods, it would be perfectly manageable when taken alongside the ability of a strong, centralised government to implement water-tight fiscal policy and economic controls.

Become part of the solution and get involved with the Party today.

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate | Join

Also arrived today are printed copies of the National Rebirth Party Manifesto -

The Twenty Demands of the National Agenda

Having a printed copy gives you something to show to friends, family and colleagues to show them our comprehensive vision for the future - something that very few if any alternative parties are willing to even attempt to offer.

If you wish to order one, please email [email protected]

Alternatively, an order form will be set up on the website shortly.

We will send them out for £5 plus postage, all money raised to go back into the Party.

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate

The reason why it was so important to create a comprehensive set of ideals and principles, is because at the moment, 'nationalism' has become synonymous with 'anything against the current establishment'. There are patriotic liberals, anarchists, libertarians, bolsheviks, Thatcherites, national socialists, fascists, third-positionists, who ALL see themselves as 'nationalists' solely because they dislike immigration, when in fact all these different ideals are irreconcilable in almost every other way. Any movement which just calls itself 'nationalist' and makes no effort to define what it is, except in terms of immigration policy, is destined to end up full of all these irreconcilable groups of people, with the inevitable implosion that follows.

Hence why, even before the National Rebirth Party was launched, the National Agenda had already been conceived, the principles were already in place, and they have not changed since.

In Summary:

The Twenty Demands of the National Agenda:

1. We demand that only people of British heritage or lineage shall be inherently entitled by birth to be British
citizens.

2. We demand that foreigners whose presence is harmful to the interests of the National Community be
expelled, without exception, from Great Britain. Those who enter without permission shall be expelled
by default and prohibited from ever returning.

3. We demand that only British citizens be permitted to vote or hold public office at any level.

4. We demand that no foreign treaty, alliance, war or undertaking be entered into or continued unless it
serves the interests of the National Community. This includes the distribution of British money to foreign
nations.

5. We demand that all citizens have equal rights, and equal duties to society. Those who refuse to carry out
their duties will be stripped of their rights.

6. We demand that every British citizen has a duty to be productive, to the best of their ability. All honest
work is honourable, and work is a duty.

7. We demand that all British men must perform some kind of military service for a period of at least 18
months, to the best of their ability.

8. We demand a justice system with the end goal of removing the most dangerous offenders from society.
The most serious crimes, including crimes against the nation and its people, must carry the death penalty.

9. We demand the creation of a new British Law System whereby the first principle of the system is
accessibility.

10. We demand freedom of religion for all British people, so long as the religion does not threaten or harm
the interests of the National Community. Any religion which does this shall be prohibited.

11. We demand the continuation of state-funded education. We further demand that the state should establish
and finance a series of schools of excellence, which will provide scholarship education of the highest
possible quality, free of charge, with admittance purely on the basis of academic merit.

12. We demand that British citizens shall continue to have access to a state-funded National Health Service,
and the state should routinely promote and fund programmes which encourage a physically and mentally
healthy lifestyle. Foreigners or visitors will be required to pay for the use of public health services.

13. We demand that the re-zoning of green land for other uses must only occur by absolute national necessity.
Policies to protect the environment must be realistic and achievable and not based on impossible goals.

14. We demand that productive private enterprise be bolstered as a cornerstone of British society. Businesses
should be encouraged to form co-operatives and collaborate where possible for mutual benefit. The state
must support businesses which work towards national economic goals.

15. We demand that all trade unions be amalgamated, and the national government assume the duty of the
protection of the worker.

16. We demand that all public utilities and transportation networks be placed into public ownership. The only
profits they will take will be those required for future investment.

17. We demand that the financial method of endlessly accumulating debt be ended, and that the two principal
objectives of fiscal policy be to 1) eliminate debt, and 2) prevent inflation.

18. We demand that tariffs be applied where necessary to protect and foster the development of British
enterprises. International capitalism, and its relentless destruction of British industries, must be ended.

19. We demand a welfare system that provides unemployed or destitute persons productive employment as
opposed to a dependency income. The welfare system must also include profit margin limitations on rents
and property prices.

20. We demand that the British state be controlled by a strong national government, with total authority,
whose legitimacy derives directly from the consent of the British citizenry by way of plebiscites and
referenda of public approval.

A PDF copy available for anyone to view:

The Manifesto of the National Rebirth Party

The Twenty Demands of the National Agenda

To make this Agenda a reality, then GET INVOLVED TODAY

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate | Join

Farmers Protest.

ABSOLUTE DISASTER.

Completely controlled by the state.

David Cameron's sister in law on the stage.

SIR ED DAVEY as well.

REAL farmers need to stand up!

And this is PRECISELY why only last night, I was straight up telling nationalists NOT to try and co-opt this or use it as a platform. I am aware that there are nationalist parties, groups, entities who have gone to this and supported it, and have now found themselves acting as supporting acts to the Conservative Party, standing about in the crowd cheering in the likes of Kemi Badenoch and Sir Ed Davey.

Conservative Party politicians supporting this protest is pure hypocrisy, because the kind of free-market international capitalism that has been spearheaded by the Conservatives since the 1970s, has done more damage to the farming industry than anything else.

The EU and the free-market globalism that came with it, did 40 years of devastation, and it was actually the Conservatives who took Britain into the 'free market' EU in the first place, and at the time it was, ironically, Labour who were most opposed to it.

Two other things I would like to re-iterate from the stream last night with David Clews (which you can rewatch in full HERE https://rumble.com/v5qnzjh-special-guest-alek-yerbury-joins-the-show.html):

I was asked, 'Shouldn't you be piggybacking on whatever causes are available, i.e. farmers protests, migrant hotels etc?'

The answer is no, and the reason why is because most of these campaigns/causes are contradictory to each other in what they call for, AND often contradictory to the ideals and principles of the political movement as a whole. Piggybacking on whatever just happens to be topical at the time, almost always leads to inconsistency and hypocrisy. Nationalist leaders, collectively, have a terrible reputation for being shameless chancers who will say and do anything in pursuit of short-term attention, even if it contradicts their own principles. And this reputation has, for the most part, been fairly earned.

So no, nationalists should NOT be constantly looking for weekly topical causes to piggyback, unless those causes are genuinely consistent with the principles and ideology being espoused. Once a person/party gets a reputation for just telling people whatever they want to hear, at the time, then it becomes impossible for anyone to ever trust anything being said.

We also talked about social media reach, and the way that it doesn't translate into real world influence:

There is an extremely common belief in the nationalist sphere, that the reason why nationalists don't win elections, is because people don't know that they exist. In other words, that if people are aware of our existence, we will start winning, and that all we need to do is just propagate ourselves everywhere.

It's a dangerous and groundless belief.

99% of people are not going to vote for a nationalist party just because it exists. They are not going to get a leaflet through a letterbox and just decide, 'Oh I didn't know they existed, I'll vote for them now.' It takes a bit more effort than that. We have to be able to actually demonstrate our ideals being beneficial to everyone, actually talk to people (including people who don't agree with or like us), actually behave in a consistent and competent way. Just belt feeding ourselves around social media won't do anything.

The other danger of this belief is that it causes people to think, 'Anything I can do to get attention is good for the cause', which leads them to do things that can be outrageous, destructive or aimless just for the sake of getting attention, which damages the reputation of the people doing it.

I am well aware that there are many people who think that I don't know what I'm talking about when I identify issues or predict what is going to go wrong if it isn't addressed. I don't say these things to be a harbinger of doom. I say them because I would love to see them be averted. But in most cases they don't get averted, and over time those same detractors will recognise that those who predicted problems before they occurred, every single time, are the ones who are most capable of being able to fix those problems, which benefits everybody ultimately.

When I was part of PA, I predicted and warned in January 2023 that some kind of upcoming split was imminent (even though I had no idea of who was involved or the scale of it), because of the decisions being made at the top, the way the public were being engaged with, and the attitudes of people in the periphery. I also said what needed to be done to prevent it (though got ignored), and there are people who will remember having conversations with me about this at the time. And then it happened a couple of months later.

When some of these ill-conceived 'unity' ventures were being floated, I predicted that they would only damage the people involved rather than help them, and said what needed to be done to fix it. Again, there are people in June 2023 who will remember everything I said at one such 'unity meeting'. Fast forward a year, most of the people who remained involved are in a worse position now than 12 months ago.

When Reform became the 'bandwagon' party of the right, I predicted that it would slowly become more and more like the Conservative Party to the point where it would be indistinguishable. Now, that has happened, and masses of people are very openly calling it Tory 2.0, including people that actually supported, voted, or encouraged people to vote for it only in July.

So when I now talk about the fact that, by the time of the next GE, these 'alt-right'/'nationalist'/'third position' parties will have liberalised and Tory-fied to the point where THEY become Tory 3.0/4.0/5.0, I hope that what I've said regarding how to fix this will be heeded. I suspect it won't be, because the lure of easy short-term gain by having ropey principles and easy Conservative money is too strong for most to resist. The National Rebirth Party will be spared this fate because we alone are aware of this problem AND I am in a position where I can prevent it from happening.

As always, time will tell, but here and now, my words can be marked.

I am appearing on this from 20:30 to discuss, among other things, the problem of right-wing/nationalist parties turning into replicas of the Conservative Party

Today is another dark day in our recent history.

A veteran is behind bars tonight away from his family.

His crime?

Comments on Facebook.

Looking at this in full and joined by guest Alek Yerbury.

Tune in from 8pm on 👇👇👇

https://dlive.tv/UnityNews

or

https://rumble.com/v5qnzjh-special-guest-alek-yerbury-joins-the-show.html

Keir Starmer is not going to resign or be made to resign because people on social media 'like' posts saying he should, or 'ratio' him in the comments.

That's fact whether people want to hear it or not.

Wanting a political campaign that is 'non-political', people who believe in free-market capitalism claiming to care about British farmers, all and sundry throwing away their own principles in a desperate quest for relevance.

There is no point to this event or in anyone attending, better to just pretend it isn't there and focus the energy on ACTUALLY trying to solve the problem in a coherent, constructive way. Carry on with your own political campaigning, this kind of thing is just a meaningless distraction.

Further to what I said earlier about the 'save yourself' mentality, it goes hand in hand with the people who think themselves stunning and brave for using the word 'remigration' on social media, but simultaneously think that any part of the country less than 95% white British or urbanised and deprived is, 'too far gone', 'too dangerous', or 'too risky' to help, despite the fact that it is where 95% of the people who GENUINELY need an alternative actually live.

I've made no secret of this many times before, that I have no time whatsoever for these 'retreat' projects that involve white British people just running away to the woods, abandoning everyone else to their fate, and creating 'communes'.

This isn't brave, it's a mentality of, 'Every man for himself.' These kinds of people genuinely don't care about anybody other than themselves, because if they did, they would actually try and fix the problems affecting those around them, rather than just run away.

It's even more horrendous, when people do this, and then try and argue that they are doing it, 'For the greater good'. It's like someone hoarding food and growing obese during a famine and claiming it's 'for the greater good'.

People whose solutions to collective problems are to abandon their own people and save themselves, don't deserve help. They deserve to be shamed.

What I liked about this, is that it it isn't just pessimistic, doom-mongering nonsense like you read most of the time on our circles, where supposed leaders have such a low opinion of the people around them and the places they live. You CAN take pride in yourself and your community, and you CAN work to overcome whatever issues they face.

New Article on the Party Website:

Reflections on Leeds, from our Leeds Branch Leader

By David Smaller,
Leeds Branch Leader

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate

It costs about £75 per month for the IT and mail infrastructure, about £70 to set up a branch with the necessary equipment, and ongoing costs to organise meetings, print literature, start-up projects and activities such as the Party Newspaper. Most of our activity is taking place in disenfranchised urban areas, because firstly, this is where most of our people actually live, and secondly, it is where there is the greatest desire for a genuine alternative to the current system. As much as many of our people there want an alternative, they also tend to have very little money to give. They also routinely get ignored by even other nationalist/alternative political parties, because places like Manchester, London, Birmingham are places where many so-called leaders fear to tread. We do not.

Therefore, we ask that anyone who supports our work, our goals and our Agenda, to support us financially however they can, even if it is just £5. We encourage our supporters to become genuine members. We encourage all those who share our vision to mobilise themselves physically to help the cause. The creation of a genuine National Community starts with a collective effort.

Support us HERE: https://nationalrebirthparty.org.uk/Donate/

Become a member HERE: https://nationalrebirthparty.org.uk/JOIN-as-a-Member/

This is why one of the first tasks for us is to cultivate discipline. At the moment as soon as we get a decent number of people together, elements in there immediately start wasting themselves, taking them out the fight. Others then come to their aid, which takes even more people out the fight.

People who can't be disciplined can't win anyway, so there's nothing to lose by being ruthless on this matter.

Another thing that is equally ridiculous is the lionisation of people for getting arrested or jailed for totally useless actions. Things like fighting with police, stickers, edgy social media posts, objectively do not accomplish anything at best, and at worst are actually detrimental. And yet, we have a really problematic tendency to treat these things like heroism. They aren't. They are pointless.

When people get treated like heroic martyrs, even if their actions accomplished nothing, all it does is encourage others to do the same thing, with the same useless results.

One of the things that persistently makes nationalist parties unelectable is their inability to be consistent, and to produce manifestos where one thing contradicts another thing.

I've watched just this morning on another platform people simultaneously advocate for the use of the military to implement 'remigration' whilst also encouraging everyone to leave and never join the military in case it leads to being sent to Ukraine.

It's ridiculous.

Political Parties should not have 'policy committees', 'policy direction teams', or 'policy writers'. The only people with the authority to write policy should be those who are in positions of leadership within the Party. And if those people can't come up with policies without outsourcing it to other people, then they shouldn't be in positions of leadership to begin with. People in back rooms who have no legitimate authority whatsoever should not be writing manifestos which the Party's leadership then propagate.

I’ve seen various people being asked the question, and therefore I will make plain my own stance on the question of Gaza, Israel and Palestine.

Gaza, as it stands, is in effect the world’s largest jail. Nobody there has anywhere TO go to, the living conditions are deplorable and have been for many years, and the population density is staggering. Every year, the conditions there only get worse rather than better, irrespective of any decisions being made by the internal government of the territory.

In the long-term, a two-state solution is the ONLY viable option for the region. If the Israelis are to be permitted to have their own ethnic homeland, then the Palestinians must be as well, otherwise a situation will be created whereby one half of the population there is either permanently in a state of oppression, OR, if expelled, is turned into a diaspora rootlessly wandering the Earth. I suspect, in the end, it will be down to the international community to determine where these two states begin and end.

From a British perspective, the government should not be assisting either side in its objectives, especially through the supply of weapons. If individual people wish to contribute humanitarian assistance out of their own pockets, then so be it. The British ‘left’ tends to be more sympathetic to the Palestinian cause, whilst the ‘right’ tends to be more sympathetic to Israel. What I have discovered amongst the ‘right’ is that the majority of advocacy for Israel is not due to any genuine support, but rather through a desire to spite the left (who are associated with Palestine), and to spite Muslims. To take stances such as that purely out of spite is completely ridiculous and I won’t harbour it.

From a Party perspective, I will refer to Demand #4 of the Twenty Demands of the National Agenda:

That no foreign treaty, alliance, war or undertaking be entered into or continued unless it serves the interests of the National Community. This includes the distribution of British money to foreign nations.

You can read the MANIFESTO of the National Rebirth Party Online NOW:

The Twenty Demands of the National Agenda

There is no other political party in Britain which offers a comprehensive THIRD OPTION to the Marxist left and Capitalist right.

Instead of these things, we call for a genuine NATIONAL COMMUNITY.

I thoroughly recommend Manchester Christmas market for a visit.

Particular highlights Yard and Coop chicken, Chocolate Kisses and a chocolate rum concoction that is available on Market Street.

One phenomena I've observed on the 'right' that doesn't exist anywhere else on the political spectrum is the amount of people who will throw time and resources into endeavours, people or organisations that they will straight up acknowledge are frauds, thieves, or useless. Effectively, they support things for the SAKE of supporting them rather than with any expectation of success.

It's like choosing to eat at a restaurant, where every previous time you ate there, you got food poisoning.

This mentality doesn't exist anywhere else in politics, and it needs remedying.

nationalrebirthparty.org.uk

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate

New Article on the Party Website:

The Habitual 'Tory-Fication' of the Alt-Right

"...We have started to see the rise of alternative or hard-line right-wing parties, the most obvious being Reform UK. As this is happening, there is a similar process that appears to occur to all of these alternative right-wing parties, some very quickly: They slowly turn into replicas of the Conservative Party."

By Alek Yerbury, Party Leader

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate

It has occurred to me today, that if laying a wreath at the Whitehall Cenotaph itself, was reserved ONLY for people who had been or were in the military, politicians or not...

That, to my knowledge, I would be the only political party leader in Britain allowed to do it.

One from Mozart for today

The Conservative Party is precisely what its members and supporters have made it. When you realise this, you understand why 'alt-right' Parties that import disillusioned Tories without requiring them to change their values, just end up carbon copies of the Conservative Party. Seen it play out in real-time with UKIP and Reform, I think we will see it again soon.

Many people reflect on Remembrance Day and how, as the years pass, it appears to become less and less significant a part of the life of the nation. Whereas two or three generations ago, war was something that everyone experienced, now, most people don't even know anybody personally who is or was in the military, let alone anybody who actually fought in a war. Which is precisely why I will continue to advocate that all young men should do as I did and spend some time in the military, which will eliminate completely any ignorance as to the painful things that have to be done to make the world as one wants it to be.

For many of the politicians, celebrities or 'influencers' of today, Remembrance Day is more about being seen to care, rather than to have any genuine feelings or attachment.

Therefore, I encourage all our people to stop and reflect on the sacrifices made both in the past and the present in war and conflict - but they should only do it, if their reflection is genuine.

Remembrance Day is, in my view, not just a day for sadness, but also a day for our people to be proud. The world is a brutal, ruthless place, just as life is, and the world belongs to those who are prepared to make sacrifices for it. Therefore, rather than just lament those who made the ultimate sacrifice for our people, instead be proud of the fact that they lived.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with people leaving one Party to join another one, or abandoning parties like Reform to join Nationalist ones.

But beware...

Because if people leave these parties and turn up at the door of nationalists or third-positionists, then they need to leave their values at the door when they come in.

I can foresee the disillusioned 'Tory' mass bouncing between parties they now perceive as 'alt-right', but without actually changing or repudiating the values and beliefs that made the Conservative Party untenable for them in the first place. The Conservative Party is entirely what its supporters made it, and unless that fact is recognised, then the problem will just endlessly repeat itself no matter how it gets rebranded.

Also arrived today are printed copies of the National Rebirth Party Manifesto -

The Twenty Demands of the National Agenda

Having a printed copy gives you something to show to friends, family and colleagues to show them our comprehensive vision for the future - something that very few if any alternative parties are willing to even attempt to offer.

If you wish to order one, please email [email protected]

Alternatively, an order form will be set up on the website shortly.

We will send them out for £5 plus postage, all money raised to go back into the Party.

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate

The first copies of Rise Britannia #3, November 2024 are going out today.

To order your copy, visit:

https://nationalrebirthparty.org.uk/Rise-Britannia/

Read about the activities of our Branches, essays and submissions from our supporters and readers, and letters from Party Officials.

It is a fantastic way of having something that you can show to family, friends and colleagues to get them interested and involved in our work.

If you have a submission or want to supply artwork for use on the cover, please contact the editor at:

[email protected]

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate

On 'Remigration':

The British government currently offers £3000 to migrants who will voluntarily leave the country. Virtually nobody takes it.

Why would increasing the amount of money on offer, or extending that offer to anyone who is some kind of 'migrant', cause more people to voluntarily accept it? Virtually nobody would give up their house, job (or welfare), and a degree of certainty in exchange for a lump sum of money to go back to a place where they have little to no long-term prospects.

There is absolutely no point in pretending that millions of people can be somehow convinced to agree to something that is blatantly illogical.

So that leaves two options on the table:

1) Money is spent getting people to leave, in which case it would be better to take all the money signposted to 'pay' people, and instead use it in some direct way to create a developed country with a reasonable quality of life in North Africa or the Middle-East, to which people could then be resettled to (which they would not resist too heavily if there is a decent quality of life, it's their ancestral homeland, and there are no cultural or ethnic issues there).

OR

2) If the intent is that people should leave whether they want to or not and NO money is to be spent, then accept the necessity for conducting a national census of the entire population to determine who is a citizen and who isn't, then create a highly organised, militarised state with completely centralised authority.

It can only be one of these two things. In my view you'd need a combination of the two, but it's politically ridiculous to pretend that just offering people a small lump sum to leave will cause anyone with an IQ higher than 70 to accept such an offer.

This kind of behaviour should fall into the category of Crime Against the Nation and its People, and the consequences for doing it should be absolute.

I met a man in Yorkshire, who had grown up in London in the 1960s/70s, and thinks the world of Margaret Thatcher. Around 2000 he moved far away from London, citing problems like immigration as the reason.

What is notable though, is the fact that even decades later, he hasn't changed any of his political principles, even though those principles are what led his home town to be so 'bad' that he had to leave it.

Why is this story relevant?

Because at the moment, the disillusionment in the Conservative Party is causing many Tories to leave that party and look elsewhere, most obvious candidate is Reform, but there are others too.

What I have observed, though, is that 90% of the people doing this, have lost faith in the Conservative brand, but NOT the actual principles. As such, parties they join en masse slowly end up becoming carbon copies of the Party they left behind, which leads to the same outcome a few years later. We've already started seeing this with Reform.

Effectively, there is no point someone changing out the Conservative Party for another one, if they aren't actually going to change any of their ideals. I've used the analogy before of giving a chef a microwave and expecting a Michelin Star meal - you can fire and replace the chef as many times as you want, but it still won't happen.

This is why the National Rebirth Party is a party of principles, that are set in stone and immovable. It is not a blank slate for people to project onto. A person either believes in the National Agenda or they don't.

And something else that is really problematic in our sphere is political leaders/election candidates articulating different views (or more or less 'hardline' views) depending on who they are talking to. The grave problem with this is that 99.9% of society will never know these people on a personal level, so all they can go on from an electoral perspective is the principles the person is espousing - and if the person ever gets caught espousing contradictory principles, from that point on the voter knows that 1) the person is willing to lie, and 2) that they can't be certain what the person's REAL views actually are.

Something I've been thinking about a lot recently is how social media has impacted politics. I think that there is a LOT of fakery in the alt-political scene (both on the left and the right). What I mean by that is that social media makes it very easy for people or groups to project a sense of power and influence that just isn't backed up by reality. It's a dangerous and short-sighted game to do that, because inevitably it is just an illusion and it comes crashing down sooner later, usually with the ramification that copious amounts of time and money were flushed down the pan.

This is why I say that the priority for nationalism ISN'T 'unifying' nationalism, it is re-integrating third-position politics into the rest of society.

HULL BRANCH meeting Wednesday November 13th, Evening

Anyone wishing to attend should contact:

[email protected]

I was asked today why it is that the far left have all these groups like Searchlight, Hope not Hate etc who constantly do 'exposés' on people, while the right has nothing similar.

Most of the reason is because the 'right' has a genuine problem with people articulating totally different ideological views depending on who they think is listening. Which makes these kinds of 'exposés' ludicrously easy and incredibly damaging to the integrity of the person who gets caught out being inconsistent.

The only solution to this is that people have GOT to stop articulating different or contradictory views in different forums. Eventually someone, somewhere hears both things and then the person's reputation for being honest is wrecked.

The way in which many people in our sphere celebrate the victory of Trump, despite not actually liking him, purely to spite the 'left', highlights the amount of nihilism in our circles.

New Article on the Party Website:

What have our Branches been up to?

Read about the REAL WORLD activities of our most active Branches in Hull, Leeds, Manchester, Birmingham and, recently, London.

If we are serious about achieving political power in this country, we must act as PART of our National Community, NOT outside of it, and must work to remedy the problems facing our society, not just isolate ourselves with a view to our own personal survival.

Support us in our work by becoming a MEMBER of the Party:

https://nationalrebirthparty.org.uk/JOIN-as-a-Member/

Or by donating, to enable us to increase the level of our activity and begin building resources for ELECTION CAMPAIGNS:

https://nationalrebirthparty.org.uk/Donate/

Britannia Awaken - Homes, Health and Honest Work for our National Community

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate

Rise Britannia Edition #03, November 2024, has now gone to print and is available to buy.

READ letters from Party officials, articles, letters to the editor, opinion pieces, and reports from our Branches on their activities and projects that YOU can get involved in.

Collect your copy in person at Branch meetings and events, or order online HERE

Retail price £2 plus postage when ordered online. Order more than 10 copies for free postage.

If you would like to become an authorised re-seller of Rise Britannia, and would like to purchase 50 or more copies at discount for resale, then contact the editor at:

[email protected]

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate

Another question to ask, in good faith, of the political leaders calling for 'mass deportations' and 'mass remigration':

Who is doing the deporting?

The reason to ask, is because what that would entail is the forced movement of people on a scale previously carried out by people like Stalin or Hitler. In other words, people capable of being completely and utterly ruthless.

When I look around, I just cannot perceive the social media commentators or Tory-esque politicians of the 'far right' possessing anywhere near the level of militancy and ruthlessness necessary to actually be like that.

For a third party to rise to significance, it needs to offer alternative ideology, NOT alternative policy. Just like Labour did when it offered socialism as opposed to Liberalism (Whigs) and Conservatism (Tories). I think only the National Rebirth Party
fully understands this.

Shared ideals/principles are much more important than shared policy views. A party which has shared ideals but different policy views is fine. A party which has shared policy views but different ideological views is on borrowed time.

This is precisely why creating any kind of organisation based around a policy (for example 'remigration') without any concern to ideology is an extremely bad idea.

A group of people who are united in their desire for a single policy, but who can't decide whether they are socialists, capitalists, communists, liberals, fascists, will inevitably implode.

When I see political factions talking about 'remigration' and 'mass deportations', it's impossible to take them seriously unless they can explain who is getting 'remigrated', how and where they are being sent to.

It is doubly impossible when they also don't believe in strong, centralised government with unlimited (but legitimate) authority, because that is what you'd need to actually organise the movement of millions of people with all that entails.

The numbers of people that these factions talk about moving are comparable to the number of Germans deported from Eastern Europe by the Soviets and the end of WW2. The idea that libertarian, Conservative types are somehow going to have the level of organisation, control and militancy to actually carry something like that out, is ignorant to a colossal degree.

If you want to radically alter society, you have to actually have an understanding of the methods required in order to do it.

Thank you to everyone who has donated specifically to the Beeston and South Leeds Outreach program:

https://t.me/nationalrebirthparty/233

There have been more referrals in the community from people who need assistance, and the funding received (which is now at £530) has enabled us to increase the number of people that are being given these deliveries of fresh vegetables, meat and bread. Anyone who would like to support this project specifically, please do so here:

https://gofund.me/654cc54f

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate

This is why I say that the real demand for an alternative to the left and the right is to be found in the large cities and towns across our nation. These are the places that have been collectively devastated by decades of pathological ignorance and greed.

Mark my words: When it comes to 'alt-right' parties (Reform, UKIP, Eng Dems, Homeland, British Dems, etc), they will end up in the situation whereby the right-wing voter agrees with them, but come election day, votes Conservative anyway or simply doesn't vote at all.

The reason for this is because these parties are perceived by the electorate (rightly or wrongly) as being hardline on immigration, but Conservative in all other respects (and anti-socialist). Therefore they are treated more like pressure groups whereby the THREAT of voting for them is intended to shift the Tories 'to the right', rather than being treated like parties with agency in their own right.

I wasn't wrong about the results of the local and general elections this year, and I don't expect to be wrong again.

This is why any nationalist party that wants to achieve any kind of power has to make itself a genuine alternative to both the left AND the right, to capitalism AND communism, to liberalism AND conservativism.