Alek Yerbury

The Twenty Highest and Twenty Lowest Turnouts at Constituency Elections in 2024

The pattern is so blindingly obvious it is beggars belief that, of all the forces currently active and putting themselves in the sphere of 'nationalism', the NRP and myself seem to be the only Party that actually recognises it.

The natural support base by sheer numbers for a genuine third option to the Marxism of the left and the capitalism of the right, is to be found in the working and middle class, deprived and ignored urban areas. For many of these people, immigration will be their single biggest concern. For others, it will be a concern but NOT their biggest concern. For some, it won't be a concern at all. Which further highlights the point that, again, is so blindingly obvious it is beggars belief how many 'leaders' can't see it: That you cannot win elections solely on the back of immigration policy.

Of the Twenty Demands of the National Agenda, only two of them deal with immigration, and that is all that is needed.

As was highlighted to me the other day by some of the Birmingham branch of the NRP, today is the 50th anniversary of the Birmingham Pub Bombings, carried out by the IRA on 21st November 1974, something that is often forgotten or ignored outside of Birmingham. There are still many people alive today who either remember the events or who knew the 21 people who died.

Everyone is talking about the problems facing farmers, and offering their support, but what is the solution?

How would the National Agenda of the National Rebirth Party remedy the farmers problems?

Demand #14 - That productive private enterprise be bolstered as a cornerstone of British society. Businesses should be encouraged to form co-operatives and collaborate where possible for mutual benefit. The state must support businesses which work towards national economic goals.

The farmers always struggled for political representation because 1) there are numerically not very many of them, 2) they tend to be cash poor which means options for fiscal influence are limited, and 3) most factions in the current system are actively out to destroy them. The sector as a whole is in the national interest, because the ability to be self-sufficient in food production, so far as possible, makes our people less vulnerable on the international stage, and it keeps money and goods in the country, which improves the general prosperity of the population. The state should be actively supporting the existence of farms, not necessarily through tax controls/relief, but through direct financial support to the industry itself, direct investment where certain food production is required or needs expansion, price controls where necessary, and the use of state organisational power to help administrate and co-ordinate the activities of the agricultural sector as a whole. Farmers are, ultimately, self-employed, so they have never been able to be ‘unionised’ in the way that other sectors have. With an element of central direction of the entire agricultural sector, the farmers as a collective would be able to be represented in a government ministry in the same way as we propose for the labour force as a whole (Demand #15 on labour and trade unions).

Demand #18 - That tariffs be applied where necessary to protect and foster the development of British enterprises. International capitalism, and its relentless destruction of British industries, must be ended.

Free-market capitalism is the single biggest detriment to British agriculture, as it forces the sector to compete with goods from overseas, including those provided at slave wages. The implementation of tariffs and import/export controls, eliminates this problem. If certain foodstuffs are being produced in Britain, they should not be able to be routinely undercut through imports. Although this, on its own, would lead to price increases for certain goods, it would be perfectly manageable when taken alongside the ability of a strong, centralised government to implement water-tight fiscal policy and economic controls.

Become part of the solution and get involved with the Party today.

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate | Join

Also arrived today are printed copies of the National Rebirth Party Manifesto -

The Twenty Demands of the National Agenda

Having a printed copy gives you something to show to friends, family and colleagues to show them our comprehensive vision for the future - something that very few if any alternative parties are willing to even attempt to offer.

If you wish to order one, please email [email protected]

Alternatively, an order form will be set up on the website shortly.

We will send them out for £5 plus postage, all money raised to go back into the Party.

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate

The reason why it was so important to create a comprehensive set of ideals and principles, is because at the moment, 'nationalism' has become synonymous with 'anything against the current establishment'. There are patriotic liberals, anarchists, libertarians, bolsheviks, Thatcherites, national socialists, fascists, third-positionists, who ALL see themselves as 'nationalists' solely because they dislike immigration, when in fact all these different ideals are irreconcilable in almost every other way. Any movement which just calls itself 'nationalist' and makes no effort to define what it is, except in terms of immigration policy, is destined to end up full of all these irreconcilable groups of people, with the inevitable implosion that follows.

Hence why, even before the National Rebirth Party was launched, the National Agenda had already been conceived, the principles were already in place, and they have not changed since.

In Summary:

The Twenty Demands of the National Agenda:

1. We demand that only people of British heritage or lineage shall be inherently entitled by birth to be British
citizens.

2. We demand that foreigners whose presence is harmful to the interests of the National Community be
expelled, without exception, from Great Britain. Those who enter without permission shall be expelled
by default and prohibited from ever returning.

3. We demand that only British citizens be permitted to vote or hold public office at any level.

4. We demand that no foreign treaty, alliance, war or undertaking be entered into or continued unless it
serves the interests of the National Community. This includes the distribution of British money to foreign
nations.

5. We demand that all citizens have equal rights, and equal duties to society. Those who refuse to carry out
their duties will be stripped of their rights.

6. We demand that every British citizen has a duty to be productive, to the best of their ability. All honest
work is honourable, and work is a duty.

7. We demand that all British men must perform some kind of military service for a period of at least 18
months, to the best of their ability.

8. We demand a justice system with the end goal of removing the most dangerous offenders from society.
The most serious crimes, including crimes against the nation and its people, must carry the death penalty.

9. We demand the creation of a new British Law System whereby the first principle of the system is
accessibility.

10. We demand freedom of religion for all British people, so long as the religion does not threaten or harm
the interests of the National Community. Any religion which does this shall be prohibited.

11. We demand the continuation of state-funded education. We further demand that the state should establish
and finance a series of schools of excellence, which will provide scholarship education of the highest
possible quality, free of charge, with admittance purely on the basis of academic merit.

12. We demand that British citizens shall continue to have access to a state-funded National Health Service,
and the state should routinely promote and fund programmes which encourage a physically and mentally
healthy lifestyle. Foreigners or visitors will be required to pay for the use of public health services.

13. We demand that the re-zoning of green land for other uses must only occur by absolute national necessity.
Policies to protect the environment must be realistic and achievable and not based on impossible goals.

14. We demand that productive private enterprise be bolstered as a cornerstone of British society. Businesses
should be encouraged to form co-operatives and collaborate where possible for mutual benefit. The state
must support businesses which work towards national economic goals.

15. We demand that all trade unions be amalgamated, and the national government assume the duty of the
protection of the worker.

16. We demand that all public utilities and transportation networks be placed into public ownership. The only
profits they will take will be those required for future investment.

17. We demand that the financial method of endlessly accumulating debt be ended, and that the two principal
objectives of fiscal policy be to 1) eliminate debt, and 2) prevent inflation.

18. We demand that tariffs be applied where necessary to protect and foster the development of British
enterprises. International capitalism, and its relentless destruction of British industries, must be ended.

19. We demand a welfare system that provides unemployed or destitute persons productive employment as
opposed to a dependency income. The welfare system must also include profit margin limitations on rents
and property prices.

20. We demand that the British state be controlled by a strong national government, with total authority,
whose legitimacy derives directly from the consent of the British citizenry by way of plebiscites and
referenda of public approval.

A PDF copy available for anyone to view:

The Manifesto of the National Rebirth Party

The Twenty Demands of the National Agenda

To make this Agenda a reality, then GET INVOLVED TODAY

Facebook | Telegram | Twitter | Tiktok | Youtube

The Party | Contact | Donate | Join

Farmers Protest.

ABSOLUTE DISASTER.

Completely controlled by the state.

David Cameron's sister in law on the stage.

SIR ED DAVEY as well.

REAL farmers need to stand up!

And this is PRECISELY why only last night, I was straight up telling nationalists NOT to try and co-opt this or use it as a platform. I am aware that there are nationalist parties, groups, entities who have gone to this and supported it, and have now found themselves acting as supporting acts to the Conservative Party, standing about in the crowd cheering in the likes of Kemi Badenoch and Sir Ed Davey.

Conservative Party politicians supporting this protest is pure hypocrisy, because the kind of free-market international capitalism that has been spearheaded by the Conservatives since the 1970s, has done more damage to the farming industry than anything else.

The EU and the free-market globalism that came with it, did 40 years of devastation, and it was actually the Conservatives who took Britain into the 'free market' EU in the first place, and at the time it was, ironically, Labour who were most opposed to it.

Two other things I would like to re-iterate from the stream last night with David Clews (which you can rewatch in full HERE https://rumble.com/v5qnzjh-special-guest-alek-yerbury-joins-the-show.html):

I was asked, 'Shouldn't you be piggybacking on whatever causes are available, i.e. farmers protests, migrant hotels etc?'

The answer is no, and the reason why is because most of these campaigns/causes are contradictory to each other in what they call for, AND often contradictory to the ideals and principles of the political movement as a whole. Piggybacking on whatever just happens to be topical at the time, almost always leads to inconsistency and hypocrisy. Nationalist leaders, collectively, have a terrible reputation for being shameless chancers who will say and do anything in pursuit of short-term attention, even if it contradicts their own principles. And this reputation has, for the most part, been fairly earned.

So no, nationalists should NOT be constantly looking for weekly topical causes to piggyback, unless those causes are genuinely consistent with the principles and ideology being espoused. Once a person/party gets a reputation for just telling people whatever they want to hear, at the time, then it becomes impossible for anyone to ever trust anything being said.

We also talked about social media reach, and the way that it doesn't translate into real world influence:

There is an extremely common belief in the nationalist sphere, that the reason why nationalists don't win elections, is because people don't know that they exist. In other words, that if people are aware of our existence, we will start winning, and that all we need to do is just propagate ourselves everywhere.

It's a dangerous and groundless belief.

99% of people are not going to vote for a nationalist party just because it exists. They are not going to get a leaflet through a letterbox and just decide, 'Oh I didn't know they existed, I'll vote for them now.' It takes a bit more effort than that. We have to be able to actually demonstrate our ideals being beneficial to everyone, actually talk to people (including people who don't agree with or like us), actually behave in a consistent and competent way. Just belt feeding ourselves around social media won't do anything.

The other danger of this belief is that it causes people to think, 'Anything I can do to get attention is good for the cause', which leads them to do things that can be outrageous, destructive or aimless just for the sake of getting attention, which damages the reputation of the people doing it.

I am well aware that there are many people who think that I don't know what I'm talking about when I identify issues or predict what is going to go wrong if it isn't addressed. I don't say these things to be a harbinger of doom. I say them because I would love to see them be averted. But in most cases they don't get averted, and over time those same detractors will recognise that those who predicted problems before they occurred, every single time, are the ones who are most capable of being able to fix those problems, which benefits everybody ultimately.

When I was part of PA, I predicted and warned in January 2023 that some kind of upcoming split was imminent (even though I had no idea of who was involved or the scale of it), because of the decisions being made at the top, the way the public were being engaged with, and the attitudes of people in the periphery. I also said what needed to be done to prevent it (though got ignored), and there are people who will remember having conversations with me about this at the time. And then it happened a couple of months later.

When some of these ill-conceived 'unity' ventures were being floated, I predicted that they would only damage the people involved rather than help them, and said what needed to be done to fix it. Again, there are people in June 2023 who will remember everything I said at one such 'unity meeting'. Fast forward a year, most of the people who remained involved are in a worse position now than 12 months ago.

When Reform became the 'bandwagon' party of the right, I predicted that it would slowly become more and more like the Conservative Party to the point where it would be indistinguishable. Now, that has happened, and masses of people are very openly calling it Tory 2.0, including people that actually supported, voted, or encouraged people to vote for it only in July.

So when I now talk about the fact that, by the time of the next GE, these 'alt-right'/'nationalist'/'third position' parties will have liberalised and Tory-fied to the point where THEY become Tory 3.0/4.0/5.0, I hope that what I've said regarding how to fix this will be heeded. I suspect it won't be, because the lure of easy short-term gain by having ropey principles and easy Conservative money is too strong for most to resist. The National Rebirth Party will be spared this fate because we alone are aware of this problem AND I am in a position where I can prevent it from happening.

As always, time will tell, but here and now, my words can be marked.

Today is another dark day in our recent history.

A veteran is behind bars tonight away from his family.

His crime?

Comments on Facebook.

Looking at this in full and joined by guest Alek Yerbury.

Tune in from 8pm on 👇👇👇

https://dlive.tv/UnityNews

or

https://rumble.com/v5qnzjh-special-guest-alek-yerbury-joins-the-show.html

I am appearing on this from 20:30 to discuss, among other things, the problem of right-wing/nationalist parties turning into replicas of the Conservative Party

Keir Starmer is not going to resign or be made to resign because people on social media 'like' posts saying he should, or 'ratio' him in the comments.

That's fact whether people want to hear it or not.

Wanting a political campaign that is 'non-political', people who believe in free-market capitalism claiming to care about British farmers, all and sundry throwing away their own principles in a desperate quest for relevance.

There is no point to this event or in anyone attending, better to just pretend it isn't there and focus the energy on ACTUALLY trying to solve the problem in a coherent, constructive way. Carry on with your own political campaigning, this kind of thing is just a meaningless distraction.

Further to what I said earlier about the 'save yourself' mentality, it goes hand in hand with the people who think themselves stunning and brave for using the word 'remigration' on social media, but simultaneously think that any part of the country less than 95% white British or urbanised and deprived is, 'too far gone', 'too dangerous', or 'too risky' to help, despite the fact that it is where 95% of the people who GENUINELY need an alternative actually live.

I've made no secret of this many times before, that I have no time whatsoever for these 'retreat' projects that involve white British people just running away to the woods, abandoning everyone else to their fate, and creating 'communes'.

This isn't brave, it's a mentality of, 'Every man for himself.' These kinds of people genuinely don't care about anybody other than themselves, because if they did, they would actually try and fix the problems affecting those around them, rather than just run away.

It's even more horrendous, when people do this, and then try and argue that they are doing it, 'For the greater good'. It's like someone hoarding food and growing obese during a famine and claiming it's 'for the greater good'.

People whose solutions to collective problems are to abandon their own people and save themselves, don't deserve help. They deserve to be shamed.