EDU.LAW

Combo Offers
Any 5 subjects -₹750
10 subjects -₹1300
20 subjects -₹2000
36 subjects -₹3000
43 subjects -₹3300

“Grab It Before It’s Gone: Exclusive Offer Ends November 3rd!”

Contact us on 7020161587 for further information

The EduLaw Diwali Offer

*The EduLaw Legal Notes*
BNS BSA AND BNSS Handbook
Constitution of India Part 1
Constitution of India Part 2
Family Law Part 1
Family Law Part 2
Law of Torts
Environmental Law
Labour Law
Cyber Law
Legal Drafting and Conveyancing
Indian Penal Code
Indian Evidence Act
NDPS Act
CPC
CrPC
Administrative Law
Indian Contract Act
Sales of Goods Act
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
IPR
Specific Relief Act
Transfer of Property Act
Right to Information Act
Company Law
Consumer Protection Act
International Law
Banking Law
Legal English
Jurisprudence
Sociology
Political Science
Interpretation of Statutes
Merger and Acquisition
Human Rights
Competition Act
Criminology and Penology
Negotiable Instruments Act
Arbitration and Conciliation
POCSO Act
Indian Stamp and Registration Act
Indian Limitation Act
Indian Medical Act

Facts:
In the case of K.S. Periyaswamy Vs. State of Karnataka the petitioner, K.S. Periyaswamy, an advocate, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petition sought a writ of mandamus directing the State of Karnataka to grant a 100% refund of court fees for cases settled through any of the modes of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) as referred to in Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The petitioner argued that the existing provision under Section 66(1) of the Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958, as amended by Act No. 9 of 2015, only allowed for a 75% refund, which was inconsistent with the provisions in other states and the recommendations of the Supreme Court in the Salem Advocates Bar Association case.

Case Analysis:
The petitioner highlighted that several states, including Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Maharashtra, and Goa, had amended their respective Court Fees Acts to allow for a 100% refund of court fees in cases settled through ADR. The petitioner argued that the Karnataka amendment, which only provided a 75% refund, was discriminatory and did not align with the Supreme Court's recommendations. The petitioner relied on the Supreme Court's judgment in the Salem Advocates Bar Association case, which emphasized the need for uniformity in court fee refunds across states to promote ADR mechanisms.

Conclusion:
The Karnataka High Court, presided by Chief Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Mohammad Nawaz, acknowledged the petitioner's arguments and the need for uniformity in court fee refunds to encourage ADR. The court directed the State of Karnataka to consider amending the Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958, to provide for a 100% refund of court fees in cases settled through ADR, in line with the Supreme Court's recommendations and the practices in other states.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DBt37dsIOhn/?igsh=OHgwbmd3ZzNkajcx

Combo Offers
Any 5 subjects -₹750
10 subjects -₹1300
20 subjects -₹2000
36 subjects -₹3000
43 subjects -₹3300

“Grab It Before It’s Gone: Exclusive Offer Ends November 3rd!”

Contact us on 7020161587 for further information

The EduLaw Diwali Offer

*The EduLaw Legal Notes*
BNS BSA AND BNSS Handbook
Constitution of India Part 1
Constitution of India Part 2
Family Law Part 1
Family Law Part 2
Law of Torts
Environmental Law
Labour Law
Cyber Law
Legal Drafting and Conveyancing
Indian Penal Code
Indian Evidence Act
NDPS Act
CPC
CrPC
Administrative Law
Indian Contract Act
Sales of Goods Act
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
IPR
Specific Relief Act
Transfer of Property Act
Right to Information Act
Company Law
Consumer Protection Act
International Law
Banking Law
Legal English
Jurisprudence
Sociology
Political Science
Interpretation of Statutes
Merger and Acquisition
Human Rights
Competition Act
Criminology and Penology
Negotiable Instruments Act
Arbitration and Conciliation
POCSO Act
Indian Stamp and Registration Act
Indian Limitation Act
Indian Medical Act

Daily Legal Judgements

*Facts*
The case revolves around a property dispute where Rajendra Kumar Gupta filed a suit against Neelam Gupta and others for the recovery of possession of a property. The property in question was purchased by Rajendra Kumar Gupta through a registered sale deed in 1968. The dispute arose when Neelam Gupta and others allegedly dispossessed Rajendra Kumar Gupta from the property in 1983. The High Court of Chhattisgarh had previously ruled in favor of Rajendra Kumar Gupta, which was challenged by Neelam Gupta and others in the Supreme Court.

*Case Analysis*
The Supreme Court examined whether the transfer of immovable property to a minor through a sale deed is valid. The appellants argued that such a transfer is void as it constitutes a contract with a minor, which is prohibited under the Indian Contract Act, 1872. However, the court clarified that a sale deed is not a contract but a conveyance of property. Therefore, the transfer of property to a minor is permissible under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The court also addressed the issue of adverse possession claimed by the respondents. It was argued that the respondents had been in continuous possession of the property for over 12 years, thus acquiring ownership rights. However, the court found that the possession was not adverse but permissive, as the respondents were family members and had initially been allowed to stay on the property.

Conclusion:
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, affirming that the transfer of immovable property to a minor through a sale deed is valid. The court also rejected the claim of adverse possession by the respondents, stating that their possession was permissive and not adverse. This judgment clarifies the legal position on the transfer of property to minors and the concept of adverse possession in family disputes.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DBQhW88IKuv/?igsh=MWFodTdudDU4MXVsZA==

The EduLaw Drafting Pleading and Conveyancing Drafting Bundle Combo

Petition u/s 13 1B of Hindu Marriage Act for Dissolution of Marriage by Mutual Consent

Our Offer Price is ₹499 for (900+ Legal Drafts) Civil, Criminal, Notices and Conveyancing Deeds and Drafts

Our Offer Price is ₹499 for Contract Law, Labour, Business Law, Consumer, Motor Vehicle Act, Writs, SLPs, Motor Vehicles Act, Intellectual Property and Family Law Drafts (600+ Legal Drafts)

Combo Offer - All Drafts (1500+ Legal Drafts) along with Legal Drafting Notes -₹799

Contact us on 7020161587 for further information

https://www.instagram.com/p/DALL7rov5F8/?igsh=OGZwYXRnd2tmbjdx

Follow us now! 📚💼 https://www.instagram.com/theedulaw?igsh=eWJreXQydHpoM3Qw&utm_source=qr

The EduLaw Legal News (7th Sept)

1. Sahil Kanuga becomes a Partner at Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas in the White-Collar Crime and Dispute Resolution Practice.

2. RBI fines Housing and Urban Development Corporation and two other entities.

3. CBI alleges AAP paid ex-Goa MLAs in cash for election expenses in the liquor policy scam.

4. Supreme Court upholds a tenfold penalty on deficit stamp duty under the Karnataka Stamp Act for document admission in evidence.

Follow us now! 📚💼 https://www.instagram.com/theedulaw?igsh=eWJreXQydHpoM3Qw&utm_source=qr

Legal News 3rd September 2024

Gujarat HC: Spouse’s involvement in an extra-marital affair may not always lead to conviction for abetment of suicide.

Bombay HC: Man directed to pay ₹2 lakh to Uddhav Thackeray for filing a frivolous petition.

Madras HC: Lawyer involved in creating a forged rental agreement to be prosecuted for misconduct.

Kerala HC: Criminal revision petition can be preferred against Sessions Court order under Section 29 of the Domestic Violence Act; original petition under Article 227 not maintainable.

Supreme Court: Summarizes principles on impounding instruments and imposing penalties under the Karnataka Stamp Act.

https://www.instagram.com/theedulaw?igsh=eWJreXQydHpoM3Qw&utm_source=qr

Legal News
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has arrested Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MLA Amanatullah Khan in connection with a money laundering case. The AAP leader was arrested following a five-hour-long interrogation by the probe agency in the Waqf Board corruption case.

*For Daily legal updates Follow us* 👇🏻 https://www.instagram.com/theedulaw?igsh=eWJreXQydHpoM3Qw&utm_source=qr

The EduLaw New Criminal Laws Handbook (BNS, BNSS, BSA)

Major Changes in Punishments in BNS Vs IPC

Our Offer Price is Rs 299 only/-

Contact us on 7020161587 for further information about our notes and offers

https://www.instagram.com/p/C-7yLI9o_eZ/?igsh=Z2dlYnZhNmY1czcw

Legal Updates 31st August 2024

1. Telangana High Court Decision: The Telangana High Court upheld the Congress government's decision to remove government lawyers appointed by the previous Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) government in various district courts between 2021 and 2023.

2. Allahabad High Court Penalty: The Allahabad High Court imposed a ₹1 lakh fine on a 77-year-old man for making serious allegations against senior advocates and district judges in Kanpur Nagar.

3. Call for More Women Judges : Supreme Court Bar Association president Kapil Sibal urged the Collegium to appoint more women judges to the High Courts and the Supreme Court.

LEGAL UPDATES August 27, 2024:

1. The Karnataka High Court ruled that the non-filing of a statement of truth at the time of submitting a written statement is a curable defect under the Commercial Courts Act.

2. The Rajasthan High Court emphasized that being below marriageable age should not deprive individuals of their fundamental rights. Consequently, the court ordered police protection for a couple.

3. The Allahabad High Court directed an inquiry into allegations of non-disclosure of evidence by the Uttar Pradesh Police in a case involving Mahant Mukesh Giri.

4. The Karnataka High Court allowed holders of light motor vehicle licenses to drive tractors, enhancing motor accident compensation provisions.

5. In a case related to the tragic death of a 12-year-old who fell from the second floor of a school building, the Delhi High Court deemed it a pure accident and granted relief to the chairman and teacher in.

LEGAL NEWS

1. Punjab and Haryana High Court: Rejected the anticipatory bail plea of a police officer accused of rape by his live-in partner.

2. Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal: Approached the Supreme Court to quash his arrest by the CBI in the Delhi excise policy case.

3. Delhi High Court: Issued a John Doe order to prevent misuse of the name and trademarks of the law firm Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co.

4. NCLT Bengaluru: Initiated insolvency proceedings against Coffee Day Enterprises Ltd, the parent company of Cafe Coffee Day.

_DAILY LEGAL NEWS (2nd August 2024)_

1. *Delhi Court Grants Bail*: Manuj Kathuria, arrested for driving his SUV through flooded roads in Rajendra Nagar, causing the death of three civil services aspirants, was granted bail on Thursday.

2. *Supreme Court Ruling*: The Supreme Court upheld the Madras High Court's decision to exclude online movie booking charges from Entertainment Tax.

3. *Arbitrator’s Ineligibility*: A discussion on the remedial challenges under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 regarding arbitrator’s ineligibility.

4. *SC on NDPS Act*: The Supreme Court indicated it may grant bail in NDPS cases involving ganja or charas, but not for heroin cases.

5. *Reservation Policy*: The Supreme Court supports excluding the creamy layer among SC/STs from reservation benefits.

Legal Update
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday filed its first charge sheet in the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test-Undergraduate or NEET-UG exam paper leak probe, naming 13 accused persons, adding that its investigations are continuing in the case.

Legal News for July 29, 2024

1. The Calcutta High Court ruled that women cannot be charged with sexual harassment under Section 354A of the IPC.

2. The Kerala High Court declared that child marriage is illegal for everyone, regardless of religion.

3. The Delhi High Court ordered Patanjali Ayurved and Baba Ramdev to remove claims blaming allopathy doctors for COVID-19 deaths while promoting Coronil as a cure.

4. A Delhi court summoned India Today and its executives in a defamation case filed by Senior Advocate Pradeep Rai.

5. 84-year-old Swami Shraddhanand, serving a life sentence for his wife’s murder, has sought parole from the Supreme Court.