Where it all ends.
Well, where do we think we are headed?
I've said previously that I believe 2024 will be the year the power base both here in the UK and globally is restructured, with some players being removed, and others repositioned, moving between political office and corporate management in the blink of an eye. There will also be those individuals and groups who will be outright banned or ostracised, deplatformed and depersoned.
I have not been shy in pointing out that the well documented and publicised agenda 2030 has, somewhat more quietly than in previous years, been continuing its progress here in the United Kingdom. It is this agenda that will usher in, with its accompanying legislation and composit parts, the beginning of a new type of society, a new structure with vastly different control mechanisms than we are used to today.
I think it is worthwhile laying out how this new society could look, based on what is proposed and also what has already happened. Some of these instances are not contained within the agenda itself, but set the scene and pave the way for the progression of the agenda and it would be wise to look at the whole picture.
For example, the recent hate speech laws passed in Scotland are not contained within the agenda, but certainly feed into things like Gender Equality and Reduced Inequalities, which are both listed as sustainable development goals of agenda 2030.
I can hear the yawn from the dissident or traditional right at this point. If truth be known I understand that. For decades the right wing had one major gripe, one point of focus, that being mass immigration, of which we have seen a huge increase, and that is why they should take notice. You see, the huge rise in mass immigration goes hand in hand with the new system being implemented, for many many reasons. Along with agenda 2030 you also have the EU migration pact, you know that buy one get one free offer, well that's pretty much what happened here.
Not only will your country be flooded with migrants, but those migrants will on the one hand hasten the need for a new system, through unsustainable preasure on the infrastructure, and also be the population most likely to accept the new system, as it will still be preferable to returning to whatever corner of the globe they've scuttled from in order to take advantage of what is on offer in the west.
Greater minds than mine have ponderd on why those in power would intentionally replace one population with another, because to be blunt, that is what is happening. White Europeans are being out bred by the ever increasing numbers of migrants pouring into our countries at eye watering speed. On top of our catastrophic birtrate, we also have to deal with a high level of racial discrimination directed at us in our own countries. The DEI objectives of ensuring as many workplaces as possible are full of people who are not there on merit, but in order to meet quotas, so as to force unwanted diversity into all areas of life.
City by City, town by town the indigenous population becomes a minority, and a hated minority to boot. What could be the reason behind that?
It is true that our financial system requires exponential population growth in order to sustain itself, as our birthrate dropped, more immigrants would be imported. The mentality of people who shift populations around the globe with no thought of the horrific consequences and as a means of keeping afloat a corrupt system, is truly psychopathic. They honestly see us as little more than inconvenient livestock.
The problem today, is slightly different in that as technology and automation have progressed, a smaller and smaller workforce is required. On the surface this may seem a good thing for business tycoons and those with large employee renumeration to consider but in fact as more and more people stop working, the money they spend on the products or services you provide dwindles.