๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ ๐ก๐ฒ๐๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐
The Supreme Court has ๐ฑ๐ถ๐๐บ๐ถ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐'๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ฃ ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐น๐ฐ๐๐๐๐ฎ ๐๐ ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ด๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฆ๐๐ป๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ณ๐ ๐๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ด๐ ๐ฃ๐๐. ๐๐๐ฑ., wherein it was held that the *purchasing dealer's ITC cannot be denied by the department on the ground that that supplying dealer has not remitted the tax so collected unless there is an exceptional case like the supplier going missing or any situation wherein it becomes impossible for the department to collect tax from such a supplier.* ๐๐ฏ๐ต๐ช๐ญ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ช๐ด ๐ข ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฆ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ข๐ฏ๐ค๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ค๐ฐ๐ท๐ฆ๐ณ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ต๐ข๐น ๐ง๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฎ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ด๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ญ๐บ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ข๐ญ๐ฆ๐ณ, ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฑ๐ข๐ณ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต ๐ด๐ฉ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐บ ๐๐๐ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ณ๐ค๐ฉ๐ข๐ด๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ข๐ญ๐ฆ๐ณ.
๐๐จ๐ข๐ช๐ฏ๐ด๐ต ๐ต๐ฉ๐ช๐ด ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ณ, ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐๐ฆ๐ฑ๐ข๐ณ๐ต๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ต ๐ง๐ช๐ญ๐ฆ๐ฅ ๐ข๐ฏ ๐๐๐ ๐ช๐ฏ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฆ ๐๐ฐ๐ถ๐ณ๐ต (๐๐ช๐ข๐ณ๐บ ๐๐ฐ. 44241/2023).
It is being reported that the SLP has been dismissed and the Calcutta High Court judgment has been upheld.
This comes as a massive victory for honest taxpayers.
The order copy of the judgment is awaited.
(๐ฆ๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ฒ: ๐ง๐ฎ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฎ)