Someone on X asked me about this new Danish study that supposedly used a placebo. Same old lying underhanded story. The article says the placebo is MMRvaxpro "solvent" and the msds sheet lists the solvent as water. But anyone who's been around long enough knows they have to lie . There are more lies than this but let's just stick to this one. Here is the crap study that empowers more infant poisoning. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38292039/
And here are some screen shots proving they used a horror show of poisons in the so called placebo.
DrSuzanneH

Dr Suzanne Humphries
All videos now here https://odysee.com/$/invite/@drsuzanneh:f
All videos now here https://odysee.com/$/invite/@drsuzanneh:f
9,270 Subscribers
86 Photos
33 Videos
Last Updated 04.03.2025 03:10
Similar Channels

17,081 Subscribers

4,089 Subscribers

3,520 Subscribers
Understanding the Controversies Surrounding Dr. Suzanne Humphries
Dr. Suzanne Humphries is a well-known figure in the realm of vaccine skepticism, a subject that has ignited fierce debates among scientists, healthcare professionals, and the general public. With a background in medicine, Dr. Humphries has publicly expressed her concerns about the safety and efficacy of vaccines, positing that they may contribute to the rising incidence of various health issues in children. Her stance is not merely rooted in personal belief; she has been vocal about interpreting scientific data in a way that aligns with her perspective, drawing attention from both supporters and detractors alike. This article examines Dr. Humphries' views, the controversies surrounding her claims, and the broader implications of her beliefs on public health and vaccination policies.
What are Dr. Suzanne Humphries' main arguments against vaccines?
Dr. Suzanne Humphries argues that vaccines may not provide the immunity they promise and can potentially lead to adverse health effects in children. She emphasizes the idea that natural immunity from infections may be more beneficial than the immunity gained from vaccination. This perspective is grounded in her belief that the body’s immune system is capable of dealing with infections in a more effective manner than vaccines that introduce synthetic components.
Additionally, she highlights anecdotal cases wherein vaccinated individuals still contract diseases, suggesting that vaccination may not be foolproof. Dr. Humphries also raises concerns about vaccine ingredients, claiming that substances used in vaccines can cause neurological and autoimmune disorders, thus questioning the safety and efficacy of the vaccination schedule recommended by health authorities.
How has the medical community responded to Dr. Humphries' claims?
The medical community has largely criticized Dr. Suzanne Humphries’ claims as lacking scientific foundation and rigor. Many health experts argue that her views are a misinterpretation of available data and that they promote vaccine hesitancy, which could lead to outbreaks of preventable diseases. Major health organizations, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO), advocate for vaccinations based on extensive studies demonstrating their safety and effectiveness.
Furthermore, prominent medical professionals have pointed out that the negative outcomes Dr. Humphries attributes to vaccines are often anecdotal and do not reflect the larger population's experience. They stress the importance of relying on peer-reviewed research and established scientific consensus when discussing immunization policies, emphasizing that vaccines are crucial for public health.
What evidence does Dr. Humphries provide to support her position?
Dr. Suzanne Humphries often cites personal experiences from her medical practice, as well as various studies that highlight potential adverse effects of vaccines. She points to cases of children who experienced health declines shortly after vaccination, framing them as evidence against vaccine safety. In her presentations and writings, she often references studies that examine the correlation between vaccines and conditions like autism and autoimmune diseases.
However, a critique of her evidence shows that many of the studies she uses have been debunked or are not widely accepted in the scientific community. For instance, the infamous study linking vaccines to autism has been retracted and discredited. Critics assert that her reliance on personal anecdotes and selective studies undermines her credibility as a medical professional.
What impact has Dr. Humphries had on vaccine skepticism?
Dr. Suzanne Humphries has made a significant impact in the realm of vaccine skepticism, garnering a following among individuals who share similar concerns regarding vaccines. Her online presence, including social media and video platforms, allows her to reach a wide audience, where she disseminates information that often contradicts established medical guidelines. Her approach appeals to those who are already skeptical of mainstream medicine and are searching for alternative viewpoints.
The influence of Dr. Humphries extends to public discussions on vaccination, contributing to a growing movement of vaccine hesitancy. This has generated concern among public health officials, as a decline in vaccination rates can lead to increased susceptibility to outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases, posing risks to community health overall.
What should individuals consider when evaluating claims about vaccines?
When evaluating claims about vaccines, individuals should critically assess the sources of information and seek out peer-reviewed studies and expert opinions from credible organizations. It is crucial to distinguish between anecdotal evidence and scientific data, as the former may not accurately represent the wider population's experiences. Consulting healthcare professionals and accessing resources from the CDC or WHO can provide balanced perspectives on vaccination.
Moreover, individuals are encouraged to consider the potential consequences of vaccine hesitancy, not only for themselves but also for community immunity. Engaging in conversations with healthcare providers and participating in educational initiatives can promote informed decision-making about vaccinations, ultimately supporting public health goals.
DrSuzanneH Telegram Channel
Are you looking for a reliable source of health and wellness information? Look no further than DrSuzanneH on Telegram! DrSuzanneH is a channel managed by the renowned Dr. Suzanne, a licensed doctor with years of experience in the field of healthcare. This channel is dedicated to providing accurate and up-to-date information on a wide range of topics related to health, wellness, and medical advancements. Whether you are looking for tips on how to improve your overall well-being, or want to stay informed about the latest medical research, DrSuzanneH has got you covered. With regular updates and engaging content, this channel is a must-follow for anyone who values their health. Join DrSuzanneH today and take the first step towards a healthier future!