بيت الأثار

If you saw the sticker I sent,
I have meme stickers saved,
Apologies.

ʿUthmān (رضي الله عنه): "No one concealed something [in his heart] except that Allāh (عز وجل) makes it appear [outwardly] through the expressions of his face and the slips of his tongue." Al-Ādāb al-Sharīʿah (1/136).

Daniel Haqiqatjou appeared on the scene many years ago presenting as someone who refutes atheists and defends Islām. After he built up a sizeable audience, he began to reveal his inner biases, resentments, hatreds and animosities towards the people of Tawīd and Sunnah, bit by bit. He is a man full of ignorance and contradictions, but his reality can be summarised in one image.

Read more:
https://abuiyaad.com/s/daniel-haqiqatjou

Shaykh Muwaffaq Hussain Al-Jaboori 🇮🇶 said: “Indeed, the numerous attempts to tarnish the reputation of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦, this good country, are attempts that are doomed from the outset. So how can an Indian film be believed and the experiences of reality be denied?”

- مقتطف من كلمة للشيخ الدكتور #موفق_الجبوري ، على صفحته في الفيس بوك.

Shaykh Rabi Bin Hādī Al-Madkhali حفظه الله said: “When we follow this methodology, it is not to serve the rulers who do not rule by what Allah has revealed. By Allah, we hate them and disassociate ourselves from them and their laws, and we declare that amongst them [are rulers who are upon] Kufr Duna Kufr [Minor disbelief] and for some of them, they may be [upon] Kufr Akbar [Major disbelief], if they believe these laws are better than the judgement of Allah, or if they believe these laws are equal to the Qur’an and the Sunnah, then they are Disbelievers. If they say these laws are inferior than the Book and the Sunnah but it is permissible to rule by, then they are Disbelievers.”

📓-[الذريعة إلى بيان مقاصد كتاب الشريعة للإمام الآجري ١/١٤٠].

Insight of the ʿUlamā al-Kibār.

Question: From the [pointed] arrows of the hostile opponents on the satellite channels is [the claim] that the cause of the bombings which occurred in our land is the book ‘Ad-Durar As-Saniyyah’ and the fatwas of Shaykh Muḥammad Bin Ibrāhīm Āal Ash-Shaykh رحمه الله, so what is your reply to this doubt, may Allāh grant you success?

Shaykh Salih Al-Fawzan حفظه الله: “This [doubt] is from ancient times, the polytheists used to consider the Prophets and their followers as omens, they would say, ‘Nothing afflicts us [of calamities] except due to them.’

So this is ancient, the one who says that about ‘Ad-Durar As-Saniyyah’ is like the one who treats the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم as an omen, as Allāh said of them, وَإِن تُصِبۡهُمۡ سَيِّئَةࣱ يَقُولُوا هَـٰذِهِۦ مِنۡ عِندِكَ, “If evil afflicts them, they say, ‘This is from you.’” (4:78).

And the Exalted said, إِن تُصِبْهُمْ سَيِّئَةٌ يَطَّيَّرُوا بِمُوسَىٰ وَمَن مَّعَهُ. “And if evil befalls them, they saw an evil omen in Mūsā and those with him…” (7:131).

So they make the people of rectification and the call to Allāh to be the cause of evil, and there is nothing strange in that. And [the book] ‘Ad-Durar As-Saniyyah’ is present, and let him look into it, is there terrorism in there or Tawḥīd. Rather, there is goodness and all praise is due Allāh.

There is Tawḥīd therein and there is rejecion of Shirk therein. There is advice and admonition therein. So wedo not listen to the speech of the hostile opposer, rather we return back to ‘Ad-Durar As-Saniyyah’, and we read [what is] in it, and this person will be exposed.”

Source: https://www.abuiyaad.com/a/fawzan-durar-saniyyah-cause-bombings

Verses from Surah Al-Furqaan | Shaykh Khalid Adh-Dhafiri at Masjid At-Tawheed, Cardiff

—— @DusDawaah ——

Help DuSunnah move to a bigger location. Donate now via: dusmasjidappeal.com

‎Question: Does an absolute truce with the Enemy (of the Muslims) imply acknowledging what it has occupied of the Muslim lands in Palestine, and that it has forever become a right for the Jews, established through treaties endorsed by the United Nations, which represents all the nations of the world and empowers it to penalize any country that seeks to recover this land or fight the Jews in it?

‎Shaykh Abd Al-Aziz Bin Baz رحمه الله: “A الصلح (Peace treaty/truce) [1] with the Ruler of the Muslims in Palestine and the Jews does not necessitate granting the Jews permanent ownership of what they have under their control/hands, but rather it requires granting them temporary ownership until the temporary truce ends or until the Muslims become strong enough to expel them from the lands of the Muslims by force during the absolute truce.

‎Thus, they should be fought when (the Muslims have the) capability until they either enter into Islam or pay the jizyah and feel themselves subdued. Similarly, this applies similarly to Christians and Majoos, as stated by Allah in Surah At-Tawbah 29, ‘Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allah, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.’

‎It has been established in the authentic (Ahādith) that (the Messenger) ﷺ would take the Jizyah from the Majoos. Due to that they are given the same ruling as Ahl Al-Kitab in (the matter) of taking the Jizyah only, that’s if they do not accept Islam. However, the permissibility of their food and women for the Muslims, it is exclusive to Ahl Al-Kitab, as established in Allah’s Book in Surah Al-Ma’idah. Furthermore, Al-Hafidh Ibn Kathir رحمه الله explicitly mentioned in his tafsir of Allah’s saying in Surah Al-Anfal 61, ‘But if they incline to peace, you also incline to it,’ The Ayah, in the context of what we mentioned regarding reconciliation.”

‎[1]. الصلح (Peace treaty & Truce) and التطبيع (Normalisation) are two different things. Refer to the Fatwa I translated from Shaykh Ali Al-Hudayfi Al-Adani حفظه الله.

https://t.me/BaytAlAthaar/1675

📓-[مجموع فتاوى ومقالات ابن باز ١٨/٤٤٨-٤٥٠].