Neueste Beiträge von Marco Polo (@marcopolo501c3) auf Telegram

Marco Polo Telegram-Beiträge

Marco Polo
The opposition research group for the American People — https://marcopolo501c3.substack.com // Founder @GarrettZ
41,626 Abonnenten
549 Fotos
109 Videos
Zuletzt aktualisiert 01.03.2025 05:00

Ähnliche Kanäle

Dan Scavino FORCE🇺🇸🦅
109,019 Abonnenten
Liz Harrington
30,094 Abonnenten
Badlands Media
18,275 Abonnenten

Der neueste Inhalt, der von Marco Polo auf Telegram geteilt wurde.

https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/116415/documents/HHRG-118-GO00-20230928-SD013.pdf
https://x.com/MarcoPolo501c3/status/1889454172723872100
https://marcopolo501c3.substack.com/p/report-on-the-biden-laptop
https://x.com/MarcoPolo501c3/status/1887811162521194796
ShowersWithJoe.com
https://www.congress.gov/118/crec/2023/06/12/169/102/CREC-2023-06-12-pt1-PgS2038.pdf
https://x.com/MarcoPolo501c3/status/1887247383542530336
The lawsuit by Hunter Biden against @MarcoPolo501c3 and @GarrettZ is the epitome of the cronyism that his father has used to steal and abuse others for decades. Hunter Biden filed a civil lawsuit under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act ("CFAA"), a criminal statute which criminalizes "hacking" (the illegal intrusion into a computer belonging to a 3rd party without permission). But Hunter Biden's lawsuit does not describe one instance in which such an intrusion took place, much less one that he could even plausibly claim to be committed by Marco Polo or Ziegler—no date of any alleged "hack" given; no single action by Marco Polo described; and certainly not a single "hacked" third-party computer identified. No, Biden claims that he's been hacked solely because Marco Polo possesses and published files, emails, pictures and videos. Essentially, Biden is claiming we misappropriated his "data," without ever addressing how others published materials well before Marco Polo. Likewise, Biden does not even admit that the materials in our publications were obtained from a copy of the laptop he abandoned in Delaware. As icing on the cake, the corrupt District Court judge assigned to this case, Hernan Vera, recently issued an order that acknowledged Hunter's case is about misappropriation of data. He did so while conveniently ignoring precedent from his own Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which already ruled clearly that the CFAA is not a misappropriation statute for property; rather, it is designed to prevent intrusion into another computer without permission. And that's something Hunter cannot prove. We need help to fend off this lawfare: FightBiden.org
https://amzn.to/3Cn0Z9o
https://x.com/MarcoPolo501c3/status/1886840381502804264