Compared to global ecosystems, all TON projects lack liquidity**—naturally, because **TON itself is young. But instead of supporting each other, projects put up barriers.
You approach a project for collaboration, and they say:
*"You're still small, you don’t have enough liquidity. We won’t work with you."*
But that project is also small! Sometimes it has even less liquidity than you.
How does that make sense? TON is an ecosystem where all projects are new. Everyone should grow together, yet many are just waiting for “big players” to come and save them.
This isn't just about the TON Foundation, but about projects themselves. **DeFi protocols, infrastructure projects, even audited teams in mainnet**—many still get ignored.
At Aqua Protocol, we’ve faced this too. We have audits, a working product, but still, we’ve heard:
*"You don’t have enough liquidity yet, so we won’t work with you."*
But where is this liquidity supposed to come from if no one wants to collaborate? Projects expect established giants to help first, but don’t support each other.
Of course, this doesn’t mean working with just anyone. Meme coins are a separate story. But if a project has a real team, audits, and a working product, why not build the ecosystem together?
If everyone in the ecosystem just waits for help but doesn’t help others, growth won’t happen. We’re all in the same boat—if TON wants to go global, projects must support each other.
——————
Web3 Startup Diary RU channel | Web3 Startup Diary EN