Many lacked any oversight.
While three misuses were found, more are likely undetected.
E.g., Furucombo received 59.5K $ARB from the Incentives Program and sent it to Kraken, leaving incentive use unclear.
ARB was meant for user rewards, but Furucombo froze them due to 'wash trading,' with users receiving fewer rewards than expected.
Later Arbitrum DAO voted to BAN Furucombo from the DAO altogether (they later returned 48k ARB).
------
It's not just Arbitrum, but an industry-wide problem.
A more spicy drama involves the ownership of Mantra DAO.
In 2020, RioDeFi created Mantra DAO, hiring two employees to run daily ops.
Things were smooth until financial reports stopped coming in after Jan 2021. The drama ended with a lawsuit in Hong Kong.
RioDeFi claims employees went rogue, treating MANTRA DAO like their own while misappropriating funds.
The employees argued that Mantra DAO can't be "owned" by anyone.
Their take is that "it's a DAO"- the $OM token holders are the real owners, making decisions through smart contracts.
The Hong Kong Court ordered the disclosure of financial reports but didn’t rule on who actually owns the DAO.
-----
Then there's Harmony: The L1 project with $ONE down by 92%
It was once home to the popular DeFi Kingdoms game.
The rise & fall story of Harmony is crazy and I recommend reading DLNews articles on it.
TL;DR: Under the vision of "10,000 DAOs to build on Harmony through a grants program" co-founders gave $5M USD with no oversight.
Multiple DAOs were given 5 to 6 figure sums with just writing a proposal.
Having just 1k followers on X and 100 Discord members was enough.
DLnews reports that "At one point, there was a mandate that the team must onboard 100 DAOs per month”
In fact, onchain data showed that the same 8 to 12 people repeatedly received the funds.
The most controversial grant involved Blu3 DAO that aimed at empowering women and non-binary people in crypto.
Blu3 DAO posted a proposal and was quickly approved for $1M by a co-founder in less than 24 hours.
A source told DLnews that the decision was made over dinner at ETHDenver.
Then Blu3 quickly stopped posting on Forum and stopped official partnership altogether.
-----
As a recent delegate for a few DAOs, I’ve seen how DAO treasuries are targeted with questionable 'services,' like a $185K grant to study why users prefer perpetual CEXs over DEXs.
To address this, Arbitrum DAO is voting on a "The Watchdog" creation that would investigate misuse of funds and potentially take legal action against bad actors.
I voted YES on this proposal.
And if you hold $ARB tokens, consider delegating to me: 0x3DDC7d25c7a1dc381443e491Bbf1Caa8928A05B0
Btw, thanks Doo from StableLabs for helping on this post.