Morning practice at six o’clock
Soldiers are in the making
Soldiers are in the making
IELTS with Salaydinov
@ieltswithme11
⭕️USEFUL INSTRUCTIONS AND MATERIALS
▪️Reading
▪️Speaking
▪️Listening
▪️Writing
The channel is run by Certified IELTS instructor: IELTS (8.5)
InshaAllah we will achieve a 9.0 together
Contact me: @shaxzodsalaydinov
Learning centre: @everestofficial
IELTS with Salaydinov
20 Oct, 17:19
Some feel that individuals today spend too much time following political news while others feel politics deserves greater attention.
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
There is a view that people are placing too much focus on political news, while critics of this idea state that the amount of time people spend reading this type of news is justified. While both sides may have credible arguments to support their ideas, I still think that politics is worth allocating time for.
On the one hand, there are some compelling reasons to argue that individuals are spending too much of their time on politics. For one, prioritizing such news can divert attention from more essential social issues. If people spend much of their time solely following political changes, societal problems, including poverty, healthcare, and unemployment, might be left overlooked. Therefore, some people contend that reporting and following political news excessively could be detrimental to society. Furthermore, too much focus on political news can create social divisions. Unlike in the past, today, people can easily access online platforms to read news outlets that report on the politics of not only local governments but also foreign countries. This, in turn, can create a distorted image of political changes among the general public since they might not be using the same sources.
However, I still think that apportioning more time to political news is justified in several respects. To begin with, by reading about political reforms and changes, people can gain a better understanding of recent amendments in legislation, which helps them make informed decisions. This enables them to avoid breaking the law due to increased awareness of recent changes in the legal system. Moreover, with more attention to political changes, people can bring more scrutiny to the actions of politicians. This allows them to hold corrupt officials accountable for the misuse of their responsibilities. In the long term, such widespread public interest in political changes ensures that they can vote for the right nominees for higher governmental positions, such as the presidency.
In conclusion, although excessive interest in the political sphere can divert attention from more crucial social issues and lead to social division, I believe that following the latest political news is pivotal. This is because it helps people make more informed choices and hold political figures more accountable for their actions.
#classwork
@ieltswithme11
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
There is a view that people are placing too much focus on political news, while critics of this idea state that the amount of time people spend reading this type of news is justified. While both sides may have credible arguments to support their ideas, I still think that politics is worth allocating time for.
On the one hand, there are some compelling reasons to argue that individuals are spending too much of their time on politics. For one, prioritizing such news can divert attention from more essential social issues. If people spend much of their time solely following political changes, societal problems, including poverty, healthcare, and unemployment, might be left overlooked. Therefore, some people contend that reporting and following political news excessively could be detrimental to society. Furthermore, too much focus on political news can create social divisions. Unlike in the past, today, people can easily access online platforms to read news outlets that report on the politics of not only local governments but also foreign countries. This, in turn, can create a distorted image of political changes among the general public since they might not be using the same sources.
However, I still think that apportioning more time to political news is justified in several respects. To begin with, by reading about political reforms and changes, people can gain a better understanding of recent amendments in legislation, which helps them make informed decisions. This enables them to avoid breaking the law due to increased awareness of recent changes in the legal system. Moreover, with more attention to political changes, people can bring more scrutiny to the actions of politicians. This allows them to hold corrupt officials accountable for the misuse of their responsibilities. In the long term, such widespread public interest in political changes ensures that they can vote for the right nominees for higher governmental positions, such as the presidency.
In conclusion, although excessive interest in the political sphere can divert attention from more crucial social issues and lead to social division, I believe that following the latest political news is pivotal. This is because it helps people make more informed choices and hold political figures more accountable for their actions.
#classwork
@ieltswithme11
IELTS with Salaydinov
20 Oct, 15:02
We don’t know after which failure we achieve what we are striving for so keep failing and keep growing.
IELTS with Salaydinov
20 Oct, 14:59
Road to success
Clearly illustrates how people fail on the way to their goals yet recover and keep stepping forward despite setbacks
Clearly illustrates how people fail on the way to their goals yet recover and keep stepping forward despite setbacks
IELTS with Salaydinov
19 Oct, 19:10
IELTS with Salaydinov
11 Oct, 18:23
1. Without somebody to correct your mistakes, you will simply fiddle around one point without much progress.
IELTS with Salaydinov
11 Oct, 18:22
Look at this wonderful structure we have learned while watching a video in the classroom 🤓🎯
IELTS with Salaydinov
10 Oct, 04:15
New schedule
Feel free to contact about the groups you want to know
@shaxzodsalaydinov
@ieltswithme11
Feel free to contact about the groups you want to know
@shaxzodsalaydinov
@ieltswithme11
IELTS with Salaydinov
09 Oct, 17:32
#task1
The bar chart compares the ratio of male and female teachers across six education settings in the UK in 2010.
Overall, female teachers were more prominent in school education, especially in nursery/pre-school and primary school, where the disparity between the two genders was the most pronounced. In contrast, male teachers slightly outnumbered their female counterparts in higher education, except for the college setting, where they represented equal shares.
Regarding female-dominated settings, females were employed in far larger numbers in school education. Nursery/Pre-school and Primary school were the settings that represented the biggest difference in the ratio of female and male staff, with women comprising approximately 97% and 95%, while men accounted for only between 3% and 5%. However, in secondary schools, the gap was narrower, still in favor of females, who made up 55% of the total teaching workforce.
Conversely, the trend was reversed for higher education. Male teachers showed higher proportions in private training institutes and university education, constituting 57% and 70%, respectively. The only setting where both genders accounted for equal percentages, of 50%, was college education.
#classwork
@ieltswithme11
The bar chart compares the ratio of male and female teachers across six education settings in the UK in 2010.
Overall, female teachers were more prominent in school education, especially in nursery/pre-school and primary school, where the disparity between the two genders was the most pronounced. In contrast, male teachers slightly outnumbered their female counterparts in higher education, except for the college setting, where they represented equal shares.
Regarding female-dominated settings, females were employed in far larger numbers in school education. Nursery/Pre-school and Primary school were the settings that represented the biggest difference in the ratio of female and male staff, with women comprising approximately 97% and 95%, while men accounted for only between 3% and 5%. However, in secondary schools, the gap was narrower, still in favor of females, who made up 55% of the total teaching workforce.
Conversely, the trend was reversed for higher education. Male teachers showed higher proportions in private training institutes and university education, constituting 57% and 70%, respectively. The only setting where both genders accounted for equal percentages, of 50%, was college education.
#classwork
@ieltswithme11
IELTS with Salaydinov
07 Oct, 13:05
Bir do'stimiz maslahat so'rab yozgan ekanlar.
Manimcha qolganlarga ham foydali bo'ladi deb share qilyapman.
Manimcha qolganlarga ham foydali bo'ladi deb share qilyapman.
1,712
subscribers
1,327
photos
233
videos
