English by YASHI PANDEY pinned Deleted message
English by YASHI PANDEY
@englishbyyashipandey
Score better, comprehend better, prepare English for all exams...bank, SSC, UPSC.
English by YASHI PANDEY
23 Oct, 04:26
Good morning everyone get ready for the 10:00 AM session
๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ. TARGET SBI ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ
Aa jana sabhi
๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ. TARGET SBI ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ
Aa jana sabhi
English by YASHI PANDEY
23 Oct, 04:26
https://www.youtube.com/live/BTUjloB0SZA?si=OedJwLO8ml7wzTA7
English by YASHI PANDEY
23 Oct, 01:46
West versus the rest
The West must not tolerate terror threats in the name of free speech
Charges levelled against India by the United States and Canada regarding New Delhiโs alleged covert operations targeted at individuals designated terrorists by it are doubtless embarrassing to India, its government and its people. No democracy that adheres to the rule of law at home and abroad can take such charges lightly. India has strongly denied any involvement and said that it is not its policy to indulge in such acts. The onus is on the U.S. and Canada to provide any evidence that suggests official Indian sanction to the alleged plots. Their double standard is, however, evident. Even a cursory overview of the U.S.โs conduct in countries hostile and friendly to it would reveal a long record of its interference in their domestic affairs. Covert operations have been a part of U.S. strategy in European countries that are treaty allies and friendly partners, not to mention countries that are its declared enemies. Considering this history, allegations by the U.S. and Canada are less about adherence to any universal standard of rule of law than a convenient political use of that argument against a fellow democracy. The motivations for such a move remain unclear and intriguing. Indiaโs enhanced engagement with its diaspora in the West and domestic political calculations in these countries could be among them.
The historic view of western conduct apart, the facts and the circumstances of the controversy are indicative of a continued western insensitivity towards Indiaโs security concerns. Open calls for violence against India, brazen threats to blow up aircraft, and public celebrations of past violence against India are being tolerated in the name of free speech. Indian missions have come under attack from Khalistan proponents in โFive Eyesโ countries. While all this is defended as free speech, without irony, an official Canadian report has taken umbrage at Indian media reports that are critical of Khalistan propaganda, which anyway has little support in India. It is notable that all this is happening even as the West is debating whether free speech protections extend to hate speech. Most democracies face turmoil, which calls for new norms and standards, nationally and internationally. Indian immigrants form a considerable percentage of the new citizens in western countries, a trend that will hold for decades. This diaspora can contribute to the continuing vibrancy of western societies, but it also holds the risk of conflict. The India-West partnership is critical for democracy and progress in the current century. Mutual recognition of each otherโs concerns and priorities is essential for this.
The West must not tolerate terror threats in the name of free speech
Charges levelled against India by the United States and Canada regarding New Delhiโs alleged covert operations targeted at individuals designated terrorists by it are doubtless embarrassing to India, its government and its people. No democracy that adheres to the rule of law at home and abroad can take such charges lightly. India has strongly denied any involvement and said that it is not its policy to indulge in such acts. The onus is on the U.S. and Canada to provide any evidence that suggests official Indian sanction to the alleged plots. Their double standard is, however, evident. Even a cursory overview of the U.S.โs conduct in countries hostile and friendly to it would reveal a long record of its interference in their domestic affairs. Covert operations have been a part of U.S. strategy in European countries that are treaty allies and friendly partners, not to mention countries that are its declared enemies. Considering this history, allegations by the U.S. and Canada are less about adherence to any universal standard of rule of law than a convenient political use of that argument against a fellow democracy. The motivations for such a move remain unclear and intriguing. Indiaโs enhanced engagement with its diaspora in the West and domestic political calculations in these countries could be among them.
The historic view of western conduct apart, the facts and the circumstances of the controversy are indicative of a continued western insensitivity towards Indiaโs security concerns. Open calls for violence against India, brazen threats to blow up aircraft, and public celebrations of past violence against India are being tolerated in the name of free speech. Indian missions have come under attack from Khalistan proponents in โFive Eyesโ countries. While all this is defended as free speech, without irony, an official Canadian report has taken umbrage at Indian media reports that are critical of Khalistan propaganda, which anyway has little support in India. It is notable that all this is happening even as the West is debating whether free speech protections extend to hate speech. Most democracies face turmoil, which calls for new norms and standards, nationally and internationally. Indian immigrants form a considerable percentage of the new citizens in western countries, a trend that will hold for decades. This diaspora can contribute to the continuing vibrancy of western societies, but it also holds the risk of conflict. The India-West partnership is critical for democracy and progress in the current century. Mutual recognition of each otherโs concerns and priorities is essential for this.
English by YASHI PANDEY
23 Oct, 01:39
Good morning everyone get ready for the EDITORIAL ANALYSIS live at 7:00 AM
๐๐๐๐๐๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ
Aa jana sabhi
๐๐๐๐๐๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ
Aa jana sabhi
English by YASHI PANDEY
23 Oct, 01:39
https://www.youtube.com/live/9BZvWsj21dw?si=kSKT9fCTbtb4carG
English by YASHI PANDEY
23 Oct, 01:14
Good morning everyone get ready for the EDITORIAL ANALYSIS live at 7:00 AM
๐๐๐๐๐๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ
Aa jana sabhi
๐๐๐๐๐๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฏ
Aa jana sabhi
English by YASHI PANDEY
23 Oct, 01:14
https://www.youtube.com/live/9BZvWsj21dw?si=kSKT9fCTbtb4carG
English by YASHI PANDEY
22 Oct, 04:06
Good morning everyone get ready for the 10:00 AM session
TARGET - ๐ฏ SBI PO/CLERK 2024
Aa jana sabhi ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
TARGET - ๐ฏ SBI PO/CLERK 2024
Aa jana sabhi ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
English by YASHI PANDEY
22 Oct, 04:05
https://www.youtube.com/live/A4ltLnE9clU?si=YbRF9wP3Y71831H9
English by YASHI PANDEY
22 Oct, 01:46
Allow for deliberation
Lack of a legislature, regional autonomy in Ladakh have led to current protests
When decisions are taken for constituents in a province without their explicit consent or their deliberation, there could be a blowback even if the constituents initially welcomed the changes with hope. Such is the case with the abrogation of Jammu and Kashmirโs special status and its bifurcation into two Union Territories (UT), which includes the erstwhile constituent of Ladakh. While the discontent in the Kashmir Valley with both decisions is well documented, a Lokniti survey points to four-tenths of Jammu residents opposing the abrogation of special status and a larger majority seeking restoration of statehood. When Ladakh was hived off into a UT from the then unified State, the government justified this as reflecting a demand from residents of Ladakh โ Leh in particular โ who were concerned about the predominance of the Kashmir Valley and Jammu in its erstwhile legislature. Yet, five years on, the protests in Ladakh with the demand for statehood or the provinceโs inclusion in the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution โ which has provisions regarding administration of tribal areas in some North-Eastern States โ confirm the unpopularity of the decisions made by the Bharatiya Janata Party-led government. While Ladakh is host to two Autonomous Hill Councils in Leh and Kargil, the absence of an empowered legislature in the UT, which has meant little say for local governance in comparison to a larger writ for New Delhi, has given rise to these protests. The agitations, the one led by social activist Sonam Wangchuk in particular, with echoes in New Delhi, raise the question whether the Union government could have avoided the Machiavellian route of one-upmanship seen in 2019, which led to the current situation.
A larger question relates to how Ladakh has been viewed by New Delhi ever since 2019. Following Chinese incursions across the Line of Actual Control and recurring tensions in the region, Ladakh has largely been seen through a security lens. Local concerns related to livelihoods, environmental issues such as water scarcity, waste management and pollution and civic issues such as access to land for pastoral communities remain relatively unaddressed in the administrative scheme. The absence of a legislature in the newly formed UT is a key reason why residents seem agitated about the lack of deliberation or avenues to register their concerns. It goes without saying that the Union Government must find a way to meet the legitimate demands of Ladakh and grant it statehood. More importantly, the discontent also highlights the importance of preserving Indiaโs polished system of โasymmetric federalismโ that has purposefully addressed grievances.
Lack of a legislature, regional autonomy in Ladakh have led to current protests
When decisions are taken for constituents in a province without their explicit consent or their deliberation, there could be a blowback even if the constituents initially welcomed the changes with hope. Such is the case with the abrogation of Jammu and Kashmirโs special status and its bifurcation into two Union Territories (UT), which includes the erstwhile constituent of Ladakh. While the discontent in the Kashmir Valley with both decisions is well documented, a Lokniti survey points to four-tenths of Jammu residents opposing the abrogation of special status and a larger majority seeking restoration of statehood. When Ladakh was hived off into a UT from the then unified State, the government justified this as reflecting a demand from residents of Ladakh โ Leh in particular โ who were concerned about the predominance of the Kashmir Valley and Jammu in its erstwhile legislature. Yet, five years on, the protests in Ladakh with the demand for statehood or the provinceโs inclusion in the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution โ which has provisions regarding administration of tribal areas in some North-Eastern States โ confirm the unpopularity of the decisions made by the Bharatiya Janata Party-led government. While Ladakh is host to two Autonomous Hill Councils in Leh and Kargil, the absence of an empowered legislature in the UT, which has meant little say for local governance in comparison to a larger writ for New Delhi, has given rise to these protests. The agitations, the one led by social activist Sonam Wangchuk in particular, with echoes in New Delhi, raise the question whether the Union government could have avoided the Machiavellian route of one-upmanship seen in 2019, which led to the current situation.
A larger question relates to how Ladakh has been viewed by New Delhi ever since 2019. Following Chinese incursions across the Line of Actual Control and recurring tensions in the region, Ladakh has largely been seen through a security lens. Local concerns related to livelihoods, environmental issues such as water scarcity, waste management and pollution and civic issues such as access to land for pastoral communities remain relatively unaddressed in the administrative scheme. The absence of a legislature in the newly formed UT is a key reason why residents seem agitated about the lack of deliberation or avenues to register their concerns. It goes without saying that the Union Government must find a way to meet the legitimate demands of Ladakh and grant it statehood. More importantly, the discontent also highlights the importance of preserving Indiaโs polished system of โasymmetric federalismโ that has purposefully addressed grievances.
4,115
subscribers
845
photos
21
videos
